Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: J&B LAKELAND LOGISTICS, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of J&B LAKELAND LOGISTICS, LLC in 7922 42ND STREET WEST, ROCK ISLAND, IL 61201 (NAICS 321920). OSHA activity number 345345896.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch J&B Lakeland Logistics, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for J&B Lakeland Logistics, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
7922 42ND STREET WEST
City
ROCK ISLAND
State
IL
ZIP
61201
Mailing
120 S. LAKESHORE DRIVE, LAKE CITY, MN 55041
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
321920
Employees
30
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.28 B11 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Aug 12, 2021
Abate by
Aug 23, 2021
Penalty
Initial $7,022 · Current $4,213 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.28(b)(11)(ii):  The employer did not ensure that each flight of stairs having at least 3 treads and at least 4 risers is equipped with stair rail systems and handrails as described in 29 CFR 1910.28 Table D-2-Stairway Handrail Requirements.   On or about June 4, 2021, employees were exposed to potential fall hazards, while walking up and down an enclosed stairway leading to and from the interior of the building, and the stairway did not have a handrail on at least one side of the stairway.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4213
  • — Z (S) $7022

1910.37 B02

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 30 exposed
Issued
Aug 12, 2021
Abate by
Aug 23, 2021
Penalty
Initial $5,266 · Current $3,148 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.37(b)(2): Each exit was not clearly visible and marked by a sign reading "Exit":  On or about June 4, 2021, employees were exposed to smoke inhalation and burns from the lack of exit signs on the two building exits, at the Rock Island, Illinois facility.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3148
  • — Z (S) $5266

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 12, 2021
Abate by
Sep 24, 2021
Penalty
Initial $7,022 · Current $4,213 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1):A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  On or about June 4, 2021, an employee was required to use a tight fitting half-mask respirator during painting operations, and the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures.  The program shall include the following provisions of this section:  a.	Procedures for selecting respirators for use in the workplace, b.	Medical evaluations of employees required to use respirators, c.	Fit testing procedures for tight-fitting respirators, d.	Procedures for proper use of respirators in routine and reasonably foreseeable emergency situations, e.	Procedures and schedules for cleaning, disinfecting, storing, inspecting, repairing, discarding, and otherwise maintaining respirators, f.	Training of employees in respiratory hazards to which they are potentially exposed during routine and emergency situations, g.	Training of employees in the proper use of respirators, including putting on and removing them, any limitations on their use, and their maintenance, and h.	Procedures for regularly evaluating the effectiveness of the program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4213
  • — Z (S) $7022

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 12, 2021
Abate by
Sep 24, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1):The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   On or about June 4, 2021, an employee was required to use a tight fitting half-mask respirator during painting operations, and the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 12, 2021
Abate by
Sep 24, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(1):The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):   On or about June 4, 2021, an employee was required to use a tight fitting half-mask respirator during painting operations, and the employer did not ensure that the employee using a tight-fitting respirator passed an appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 12, 2021
Abate by
Sep 24, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A):Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:   On or about June 4, 2021, an employee was required to use a tight fitting half-mask respirator during painting operations, and the employer permitted the painter to have facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the employee's face.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 12, 2021
Abate by
Sep 24, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(k):The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which occurred annually and/or more often if necessary:  On or about June 4, 2021, an employee was required to use a tight fitting half-mask respirator during painting operations, and the employer did not provide training and information that included the following:  a.	Why the respirator is necessary and how improper fit, usage, or maintenance can compromise the protective effect of the respirator, b.	What limitations and capabilities of the respirator are, c.	How to use the respirator effectively in emergency situations, including situations in which the respirator malfunctions, d.	How to inspect, put on and remove, use, and check the seals of the respirator, e.	What the procedures are for maintenance and storage of the respirator, f.	How to recognize medical signs and symptoms that may limit or prevent the effective use of respirator, and  g.	General requirements of this section.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.157 E02

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Aug 12, 2021
Abate by
Aug 23, 2021
Penalty
Initial $7,022 · Current $4,213 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.157(e)(2):Portable fire extinguishers were not visually inspected at least monthly:   On or about June 4, 2021, employees were exposed to smoke inhalation and  burns because the employer had portable fire extinguishers within their facility for employee use in the event of a fire.  The company did not perform monthly visual inspections of the portable fire extinguishers to ensure that they were fully charged, undamaged, and ready for immediate employee use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $4213
  • — Z (S) $7022

1910.157 G01

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Aug 12, 2021
Abate by
Sep 16, 2021
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.157(g)(1):An educational program was not provided for all employees to familiarize them with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting:   On or about June 4, 2021, employees were exposed to smoke inhalation and burns because the employer had portable fire extinguishers within their facility for employee use in the event of a fire and did not provide an educational program to employees, in order to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards associated with incipient stage firefighting.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Aug 12, 2021
Abate by
Sep 24, 2021
Penalty
Initial $7,022 · Current $4,213 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1):The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:   On or about June 4, 2021, employees utilized hazardous chemicals including but not limited to: 341-404 Blue CHEP DAAS 3005 Type D-Power; WD-40, Stripping Paint, Chain/Cable Lube, Paint Yellow, Paint Black, Paint White, Propane, and the employer did not develop, implement, and maintain a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the employer will meet the requirements associated with the following:  a.	Paragraph (f) - Labels and Other Forms of Warning, b.	Paragraph (g) - Safety Data Sheets, and c.	Paragraph (h) - Employee Information and Training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4213
  • — Z (S) $7022

View J&B Lakeland Logistics, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345345896.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.