Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CYCLONIC VALVE CO INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CYCLONIC VALVE CO INC. in 2349 WEST VANCOUVER STREET, BROKEN ARROW, OK 74012 (NAICS 332912). OSHA activity number 345439327.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Cyclonic Valve CO INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Cyclonic Valve CO INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2349 WEST VANCOUVER STREET
City
BROKEN ARROW
State
OK
ZIP
74012
Mailing
2349 WEST VANCOUVER STREET, BROKEN ARROW, OK 74012
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332912
Employees
30
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.37 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2022
Abate by
Jan 21, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,642 · Current $2,785 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.37(a)(1):  Exit routes were not kept free of explosive or highly flammable furnishings or other decorations.  On or about July 22, 2021, and at times prior thereto, in the shipping/receiving area, the employer did not ensure that propane cylinders were not stored outside next to the fire exit door.  This exposed employees to fire hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2785.2
  • — Z (S) $4642

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2022
Abate by
Feb 28, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,642 · Current $2,785 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.151(c):  Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use.  On or about July 22, 2021, and at times prior thereto, at the battery charging area, the employer did not ensure there was a facility for flushing of the eyes.  This exposed the employees to chemicals such as, but not limited to battery acid.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2785.2
  • — Z (S) $4642

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2022
Abate by
Feb 28, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,642 · Current $2,785 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.212(a)(1):  One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks.  On or about July 22, 2021, and at times prior thereto, in the CNC machine area, the employer did not ensure the CNC lathe and mill machines had operable interlock devices installed on the door.  This exposed the employees to caught-in hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2785.2
  • — Z (S) $4642

1910.215 A02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2022
Abate by
Jan 21, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,481 · Current $2,089 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.215(a)(2):  Abrasive wheel(s) used on grinding machinery were not provided with safety guard(s) which covered the spindle end, nut, flange projections.  On or about July 22, 2021, and at times prior thereto, in the CNC machine shop and warehouse area, the employer did not ensure the safety guard was installed on a abrasive grinding machine to cover the spindle end, nut, and flange projections.  This exposed employees to caught in hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2088.6
  • — Z (S) $3481

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2022
Abate by
Jan 21, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.215(a)(4):  Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch.  On or about July 22, 2021, and at times prior thereto, in the CNC machine shop and warehouse/assembly area, the employer did not ensure the work rest on a abrasive wheel grinding machine was adjusted so that it was not greater than one-eight inch.  This exposed the employees to caught in and struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2022
Abate by
Jan 21, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.215(b)(9):The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:  On or about July 22, 2021, and at times prior thereto, in the CNC machine and assembly shop areas employees were allowed to operate an abrasive wheel grinding machine did not have tongue guard provided.  Employees were exposed to flying fragments in the event of an exploding wheel.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.215 D01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2022
Abate by
Jan 21, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.215(d)(1): Wheel(s) on grinding machine(s) were not sounded (ring test) and inspected for damage before mounting.  On or about July 22, 2021, and at times prior thereto, in the CNC machine shop area, the employer did not ensure employees were performing a "ring test" to check for cracks prior to mounting a new wheel on a grinding machine.  This exposed the employees struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2022
Penalty
Initial $2,959 · Current $1,775 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i..  On or about July 22, 2021, and at times prior thereto, in CNC Machine shop areas, the employer did not ensure the air pressure of the compressed air nozzles, used by employees for cleaning purposes, was reduced to below 30 p.s.i.  This exposed the employees struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1775.4
  • — Z (S) $2959

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345439327.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.