OSHA Inspection: A&W MANAGEMENT HOLDINGS

Issued

Nov 19, 2021

Abate by

Dec 20, 2021

Penalty

Initial $5,266 · Current $3,160 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.22(a)(2): The employer did not ensure that the  floor of each workroom is maintained in a clean and, to the extent feasible, in a dry condition. The employer did not ensure that when wet processes are used, drainage is be maintained and, to the extent feasible, dry standing places, such as false floors, platforms, and mats are provided.  a) On or about  July 31, 2021 and at times prior thereto and times after, the employer did not ensure that each floor on work area(s) was maintained in a dry condition when an air condition pipe was leaking water to the floor at a walking path between the Molding area and the area b exposing employee(s) to slip hazard(s).   b)  On or about  July 31, 2021 and at times prior thereto and times after, the employer did not ensure that each floor on work area(s) was maintained in a dry condition when a molding machine was leaking oil to the ground exposing employee(s) to slip hazard(s).

Issued

Nov 19, 2021

Abate by

Dec 20, 2021

Penalty

Initial $12,288 · Current $12,288

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.147(c)(4)(ii):The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, including, but not limited to Items of this sec(a)  On or about July 30, 2021, and times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure lockout/tagout procedure clearly and outline the scope and purpose of the procedures for including, but not limited to the HR Blow #7. The energy control procedures did not included a statement in the intended used of the procedure. Employee(s) were exposed to struck-by, caught-in, and amputation hazards.

Issued

Nov 19, 2021

Abate by

Dec 20, 2021

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(C):The energy control procedure did not clearly and specifically outline the steps for placement, removal and transfer of lockout devices or tagout devices and the responsibility for them.   On or about July 30, 2021 and times prior there to, employees who perform maintenance and servicing of the HR Blow #7. Employee(s) were exposed to caught-in, caught-in and amputation hazards in that:   a) HR Blow #7 - The lockout/tagout procedure did not specify how to lock out water energy sources.  b) HR Blow #7 - The lockout/tagout procedure does not specify in which order to reenergized the energy sources.  c)) HR Blow #7 - The lockout/tagout procedure does not specify how long to wait to contact hot surfaces.

Issued

Nov 19, 2021

Abate by

Dec 20, 2021

Penalty

Initial $5,266 · Current $5,266

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.147(c)(5)(ii)(D):Lockout devices and tagout devices did not indicate the identity of the employee applying the device(s).  On or about July 30, 2021 and times prior there to, the employer did not ensure lockout devices that were in use on machinery were clearly labelled to identify the person that applied the lock.

Issued

Nov 19, 2021

Abate by

Dec 20, 2021

Penalty

Initial $12,288 · Current $12,288

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A):Authorized employee(s) did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation.  On or about July 30, 2021 and times prior there to, the employer did not ensure employees authorized to perform energy isolation activities related to job duties were formally trained to identify applicable hazards, energy sources and means necessary for energy isolation.

Issued

Nov 19, 2021

Abate by

Dec 20, 2021

Penalty

Initial $12,288 · Current $12,288

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.147(e)(3):Each lockout or tagout device was not removed from each energy isolating device by the employee who applied the device.  On or about July 30, 2021 and times prior there to, the employer did not ensure an energy isolation device (lock) was being removed by the person that placed the lock on the energy source or equipment.

Issued

Nov 19, 2021

Abate by

Jun 28, 2022

Penalty

Initial $12,288 · Current $7,373 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.178(a)(4):Modifications or additions which affect capacity and safe operation of powered industrial truck were performed by the employer without the manufacturer's prior written approval:  On or about September 22, 2021 and times prior there to, the employer did not ensure that the following modifications or additions to the facility utilized powered industrial trucks were approved in writing from the manufacturer:  a) Blue Forklift Telescoping Jib Boom Crane Attachment b) Green Jib Boom Crane Attachment c) Yellow Forklift Aerial Platform d) Yellow Forklift Extenders

Issued

Nov 19, 2021

Abate by

Dec 20, 2021

Penalty

Initial $5,266 · Current $5,266

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.178(a)(6):The employer did not ensure that all nameplates and markings were in place:  On or about September 22, 2021 and times prior there to, the employer did not ensure the manufacturer name and data plate were legible and in place on powered industrial trucks being utilized in the facility.

Issued

Nov 19, 2021

Abate by

Dec 20, 2021

Penalty

Initial $5,266 · Current $3,160 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.212(a)(3)(ii):Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):  On or about July 30, 2021 and times prior there to and after, the employer did not ensure that the Bridgeport drill press in the Maintenance Shop was provided with appropriate guards that prevent the operator from having their hand or body part near the point of operation.

Issued

Nov 19, 2021

Abate by

Dec 20, 2021

Penalty

Initial $10,533 · Current $6,320 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.215(b)(9):The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch  On or about July 30, 2021 and times prior thereto and after, the employer did not ensure the floor stand mounted bench grinder (Dayton) in the Maintenance Shop was equipped with an adjustable safety guard.

Issued

Nov 19, 2021

Abate by

Dec 20, 2021

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.215(a)(4):Grinding machinery was not used with work rest(s) to support offhand grinding work.  On or about July 30, 2021 and times prior there to and after, the employer did not ensure the floor stand bench grinder (Dayton) in the Maintenance Shop was equipped with a work rest to support off-hand grinding work. No guards or rests were installed on the left side of the grinder.

Issued

Nov 19, 2021

Abate by

Oct 17, 2022

Penalty

Initial $986 · Current $592 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.147(c)(6)(i):The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed.  On or about July 30, 2021 and times prior there to, the employer did not ensure periodic inspections were being conducted at least annually on the energy control procedures.

Issued

Nov 19, 2021

Abate by

Dec 20, 2021

Penalty

Initial $986 · Current $592 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1910.147(c)(7)(iv):The employer did not certify that employee training had been accomplished and kept up to date.  On or about July 30, 2021 and times prior there to, the employer did not ensure employees were trained on the energy isolation procedures on different types of machinery employees were expected to work on and work around.