Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JM EXTERIOR SIDING CORPORATION

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of JM EXTERIOR SIDING CORPORATION in COE-BROWN ACADEMY 907 1ST NH TURNPIKE, NORTHWOOD, NH 03261 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345457089.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch JM Exterior Siding Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for JM Exterior Siding Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
COE-BROWN ACADEMY 907 1ST NH TURNPIKE
City
NORTHWOOD
State
NH
ZIP
03261
Mailing
93 W. 6TH ST. APT- 2, LOWELL, MA 01850
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2021
Abate by
Oct 6, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,926 · Current $3,000
29 CFR  1926.100(a): Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:  Site - Employees working on the ground to clear debris were not provided with hard hats while working directly beneath a crew working on the roof.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $2926

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2021
Abate by
Oct 6, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,926 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles:  Site - Employees were not provided with eye protection while using pneumatic nail guns to install asphalt shingles.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2926

1926.501 B11

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2021
Abate by
Oct 6, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:  Site - Employees performing roofing work were not protected from falls of between 8 and 15 feet when fall protection equipment was not utilized.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2021
Abate by
Oct 6, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,926 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1):Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  Site - An aluminum extension ladder used to gain access to and from the roof was not extended at least three feet above the roofs eav
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2926

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2021
Abate by
Oct 6, 2021
Penalty
Initial $2,926 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(5)(i):Non-self-supporting ladder(s) were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder:  Site - An aluminum extension ladder used by employees to gain access to and from the roof was set up at an unsafe angle approximately 1:1.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2926

View JM Exterior Siding Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345457089.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.