OMAHA, NE —
OSHA Inspection: SUPERIOR LIGHTING, INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of SUPERIOR LIGHTING, INC. in 5115 NO. 60TH ST., OMAHA, NE 68104 (NAICS 238210). OSHA activity number 345464374.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SUPERIOR LIGHTING, INC.
- Site address
- 5115 NO. 60TH ST.
- City
- OMAHA
- State
- NE
- ZIP
- 68104
- Mailing
- 2121 S 24TH STREET, OMAHA, NE 68108
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238210
- Employees
- 62
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Nov 22, 2021
- Abate by
- Dec 17, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $10,513 · Current $8,410 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2):The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: The employer is failing to protect employees from electrical hazards. This was most recently documented on August 6th, 2021, Omaha, Nebraska. An employee was working from an elevated position in aerial device within feet of energized primary distribution conductors. The employee in this particular scenario was unable to distinguish the difference between primary and secondary conductors.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $8410
- — Z (S) $10513
1926.95 A
- Issued
- Nov 22, 2021
- Abate by
- Dec 17, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $10,513 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.95(a):Personal protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, was not provided, used, or maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition it was necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation, or physical contact. The employer is failing to protect employees from electrical shock. This was most recently documented on or about August 6th, 2021, Omaha, Nebraska. An employee was engaged in electrical activities and was not provided protective clothing when working on or near energized conductors.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $10513
1926.95 C
- Issued
- Nov 22, 2021
- Abate by
- Dec 17, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.95(c):Personal protective equipment was not of safe design and construction for the work to be performed: The employer is failing to protect employees from electrical shock. This was most recently documented on or about August 6th, 2021, Omaha, Nebraska. Employees are handling energized conductors on a routine basis without using electrically approved gloves.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.416 A01
- Issued
- Nov 22, 2021
- Abate by
- Dec 17, 2021
- Penalty
- Initial $10,513 · Current $10,513
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1):Employees were permitted to work in proximity to electric power circuits and were not protected against electric shock by de-energizing and grounding the circuits or effectively guarding the circuits by insulation or other means: The employer is failing to protect employees from electrical shock. This was most recently documented on or about August 6th, 2021, Omaha, Nebraska. An employee was engaged in electrical activities that required the employee to be in close proximity of high voltage energized electrical conductors. The employee was exposed to electrical hazards because there were no additional safety measures taken by the employer. As a result, the employee suffered from electrical burns.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $10513
- — Z (S) $10513
More inspections at Superior Lighting, INC.
View Superior Lighting, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238210)
More inspections in NE
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345464374.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.