Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ROSE AIRCRAFT SERVICES, INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of ROSE AIRCRAFT SERVICES, INC. in 132 FLIGHT LN, MENA, AR 71953 (NAICS 488190). OSHA activity number 345504377.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Rose Aircraft Services, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Rose Aircraft Services, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
132 FLIGHT LN
City
MENA
State
AR
ZIP
71953
Mailing
132 FLIGHT LN, MENA, AR 71953
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
488190
Employees
75
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.28 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2022
Abate by
Apr 19, 2022
Penalty
Initial $7,977 · Current $5,584 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.28(b)(1)(i):  The employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that is 4 feet (1.2m) or more above a lower level was protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system:  On or about September 28, 2021, in the painting hangar, employees working on top a plane wing were exposed to a fall of 4-ft. and 7 inches (139.7 cm).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5584
  • — Z (S) $7977

1910.134 D03 III B 2

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2022
Abate by
May 19, 2022
Penalty
Initial $11,167 · Current $7,817 Reduced

Hazardous substances A100

29 CFR  1910.134(d)(3)(iii)(B)(2):  The employer did not implement a change schedule for canisters and cartridges that was based on objective information or data that would ensure that canisters and cartridges were changed before the end of their service life:  On or about March 10, 2022, in the preparation hangar, employees wearing 3M full face respirators were exposed to high concentrations of dusts in their respirator cartridges created from sanding aircraft.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7817
  • — Z (S) $11167

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2022
Abate by
May 19, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1):  The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  On or about September 28, 2021, in the Prep and Paint Hangars, employees painting and sanding aircraft were  exposed to aluminum dust and titanium dioxide.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F05

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2022
Abate by
May 19, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(5):  The fit test was not administered using an OSHA-accepted qualitative fit test or quantitative fit test protocol:  On or about September 28, 2021, in the burn lab,  employees were fit tested by the process of burning carpet and leather and evaluating if the presence of the odors were inhaled or detected.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2022
Abate by
May 19, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A):  The employer shall not permit respirators with tight-fitting facepieces to be worn by employees who have facial hair that comes between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interferes with valve function.   On or about March 10, 2022, an employee with a full beard was sanding paint of an aircraft in the preparation hangar  while wearing a full face respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.141 G02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2022
Abate by
Apr 19, 2022
Penalty
Initial $6,381 · Current $4,465 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.141(g)(2):  Employees were permitted to consume food or beverage in area(s) exposed to toxic materials:  On or about September 28, 2021, inside of the paint hangar, employees were drinking next to where they keep methyl ethyl ketone and aircraft paint.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4465
  • — Z (S) $6381

1910.242 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2022
Abate by
Apr 19, 2022
Penalty
Initial $9,572 · Current $6,700 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.242(b):  Compressed air, that was not reduced to less than 30 psi, was used for cleaning purposes without effective chip guarding and personal protective equipment.  On or about March 10, 2022, employees in the preparation hangar used the dead-end of 120 psi compressed air hoses to remove dust from their body and clothing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6700
  • — Z (S) $9572

View Rose Aircraft Services, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345504377.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.