Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: INTERTAPE POLYMER GROUP

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of INTERTAPE POLYMER GROUP in 1800 E PLEASANT ST, SPRINGFIELD, OH 45505 (NAICS 326112). OSHA activity number 345531925.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Intertape Polymer Group — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Intertape Polymer Group is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1800 E PLEASANT ST
City
SPRINGFIELD
State
OH
ZIP
45505
Mailing
1800 E PLEASANT ST, SPRINGFIELD, OH 45505
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326112
Employees
657
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 16 exposed
Issued
Jan 4, 2022
Abate by
Mar 31, 2022
Penalty
Initial $13,653 · Current $13,653
29 CFR  1910.212(a)(1): Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.   a) On or about September 13, 2021, no machine guarding was provided by the employer to protect employees from moving material coming off of rolls located at the primary unwind of the Davis Standard 12 foot Coater/ Laminator as they walked through the moving material in order to cut it with shears. Employees were exposed to a caught between hazard from the moving material and the intake rollers.  b) On or about September 22, 2021, inadequate machine guarding was provided by the employer to protect employees from ingoing nip points between the rollers of the Davis Standard 12 foot Coater Laminator at Section B at the OP 190 panel in that employees had to put their hands and arms inside the mesh enclosure to spray silicone lubricant onto the moving rollers, and the railing in front of these rollers was inadequate to prevent employee exposure to the ingoing nip points.  c) On or about September 22, 2021, no guarding was provided by the employer to protect employees from ingoing nip points between the rollers and the material of the Davis Standard 12 foot Coater Laminator at the intake rollers where the air guide is located.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $13653
  • — Z (S) $13653

1910.219 C02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Jan 4, 2022
Abate by
Mar 31, 2022
Penalty
Initial $10,728 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.219(c)(2)(i):All exposed parts of horizontal shafting seven (7) feet or less from floor or working platform, excepting runways used exclusively for oiling, or running adjustments, shall be protected by a stationary casing enclosing shafting completely or by a trough enclosing sides and top or sides and bottom of shafting as location requires.  a) On or about November 4, 2021, the employer had not enclosed the unused portions of the four horizontal shafts located at the Primary Unwind and the Center Unwind on the Davis Standard Standard Coater/Laminator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $10728

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 657 exposed
Issued
Jan 4, 2022
Abate by
Mar 31, 2022
Penalty
Initial $858 · Current $858
29 CFR  1910.132(d)(2): The employer shall verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment.   a) On or about September 17, 2021, the employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through a written certification.  The Intertape Polymer Group was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1186896, citation number 2, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on February 22, 2017, with respect to a workplace located at 1095 S. 4th Ave., Brighton, CO 80601.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $858
  • — Z (R) $858

1910.147 C06 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Jan 4, 2022
Abate by
Mar 31, 2022
Penalty
Initial $858 · Current $858
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(6)(i):The employer shall conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirements of this standard are being followed.  a) On or about September 17, 2021 in building C, the employer had not conducted a periodic review of the lockout procedures at least annually for machines such as but not limited to the 12 foot Davis Standard Coater/ Laminator.  The Intertape Polymer Group was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR  1910.147(c)(6)(i), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1186896, citation number 1, item number 2b and was affirmed as a final order on February 22, 2017, with respect to a workplace located at 1095 S. 4th Ave., Brighton, CO 80601.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $858
  • — Z (R) $858

1910.1200 E01 I

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 16 exposed
Issued
Jan 4, 2022
Abate by
Feb 22, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1)(i): A list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using a product identifier that is referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet (the list may be compiled for the workplace as a whole or for individual work areas); and,   a) On or about September 22, 2021 in building C at the Davis Standard 12 foot Coater/ Laminator, the employer had not compiled a list of hazardous chemicals for chemicals such as but not limited to Ace Silicone Lubricant (skin irritant) and White PA PE MB (burn hazard).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Intertape Polymer Group's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345531925.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.