BLYTHE, CA —
OSHA Inspection: U.S. BORDER PATROL - BLYTHE STATION
Federal Agency inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a federal Agency health inspection of U.S. BORDER PATROL - BLYTHE STATION in 16870 WEST HOBSON WAY, BLYTHE, CA 92225 (NAICS 928120). OSHA activity number 345561336.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- U.S. BORDER PATROL - BLYTHE STATION
- Site address
- 16870 WEST HOBSON WAY
- City
- BLYTHE
- State
- CA
- ZIP
- 92225
- Mailing
- 16870 WEST HOBSON WAY, BLYTHE, CA 92225
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Federal Agency (M)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 928120
- Employees
- 100
- Ownership type
- D
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Feb 17, 2022
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (a) PROCESSING: On or about November 17, 2021 and at times prior to, employees were required to wear N95 filter facepiece respirators for protection against aerosolized SARS-CoV-2 virus and the employer had not obtained a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator. (b) PROCESSING: On or about November 17, 2021 and at times prior to, employees who had been medically evaluated to wear a powered air purifying respirator (PAPR) were required to wear N95 filter facepiece respirators for protection against aerosolized SARS-CoV-2 virus. The employer had not obtained a medical evaluation to determine employees' ability to use an N95 filtering facepiece respirator.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Feb 17, 2022
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2):Employee(s) using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator were not annually fit tested: (a) PROCESSING: On or about November 17, 2021 and at times prior to, employees were required to wear N95 respirators for protection against aerosolized SARS-CoV-2 virus and had not received an annual fit test.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F05
- Issued
- Feb 17, 2022
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(5):The fit test was not administered using an OSHA-accepted qualitative fit test or quantitative fit test protocol: (a) PROCESSING: On or about November 17, 2021 and at times prior to, employees were required to wear an N95 filtering facepiece respirator to protect against the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and were not fit tested using an OSHA-accepted protocol.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 928120)
More inspections in CA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345561336.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.