Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MIGUEL VALDIVIA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MIGUEL VALDIVIA in 5413 BASHAM LANE, DENTON, TX 76207 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 345569875.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Miguel Valdivia — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Miguel Valdivia is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MIGUEL VALDIVIA
Site address
5413 BASHAM LANE
City
DENTON
State
TX
ZIP
76207
Mailing
270 HOLDER TRAIL, MCKINNEY, TX 75071
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 22, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
29 CFR  1926.451(b)(1):Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii).  On or about October 4, 2021 and times prior there to, the employer did not ensure that all working levels of scaffold were fully planked on the first and second tier of the tubular welded scaffold system in the following instances:  a) first tier, middle section where there was a piece of plywood covering the 10 inch gap in the planking b) second tier, the left and middle section were not fully planked from guard rail support to guard rail support
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.451 B03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 22, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
29 CFR  1926.451(b)(3):Except as provided in paragraphs (b)(3)(i) and (ii) of this section, the front edge of all platforms shall not be more than 14 inches (36 cm) from the face of the work, unless guardrail systems are erected along the front edge and/or personal fall arrest systems are used in accordance with paragraph (g) of this section to protect employees from falling.  On or about October 4, 2021 and times prior there to, the employer did not ensure the welded tubular scaffold system was erected in such a manner to have the front edge of the working platform to be no more than 14 inches from the face of the work zone.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.451 C02 I

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 22, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
29 CFR  1926.451(c)(2)(i): Footings were not level, sound, rigid, and capable of supporting the loaded scaffold without settling or displacement.  On or about October 4, 2021 and times prior there to, the employer did not ensure the footings of the tubular welded scaffold system were level and not subjected to settling caused by standing water or displacement in the following instances:  a) Far left section of scaffold, footing not secure or square on wooden base plate b) Right section of scaffold to right of doorway, footings of scaffold were sinking into mud due to standing water
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.451 C03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 22, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
29 CFR  1926.451(c)(3): Supported scaffold poles, legs, post, frames, and/or uprights were not plumb and braced to prevent swaying and displacement.  On or about October 4, 2021 and times prior there to, the employer did not ensure the scaffold system erected on the side of the house was supported and braced in a way to prevent swaying while employees occupied scaffold system.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 22, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
29 CFR  1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access.  On or about October 4, 2021 and times prior there to, the employer did not ensure employees tasked with accessing a multi-tiered scaffold system were provided with a safe means of accessing the scaffold via ladder or direct access.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.451 H02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 22, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
29 CFR  1926.451(h)(2): Employees working below a scaffold were not protected from falling tools, materials or equipment in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs (h)(2)(i)-(v) of this section.   On or about October 4, 2021 and times prior there to, the employer did not ensure an employee working below a scaffold was protected from falling tools, material or equipment by the use of toeboards, guard rail system, canopy structure or a barricade on the ground level.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4096

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 22, 2021
Abate by
Nov 22, 2021
Penalty
Initial $4,096 · Current $4,096
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   On or about October 4, 2021 and times prior there to, the employer did not ensure employees performing residential construction activities of brick installation  on the second story roof of the residential home were protected via personal fall protection system.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4096

View Miguel Valdivia's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345569875.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.