Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: U.S. BORDER PATROL

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of U.S. BORDER PATROL in 4035 S. AVENUE A CENTRAL PROCESSING CENTER, YUMA, AZ 85365 (NAICS 928110). OSHA activity number 345591903.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch U.S. Border Patrol — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for U.S. Border Patrol is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
U.S. BORDER PATROL
Site address
4035 S. AVENUE A CENTRAL PROCESSING CENTER
City
YUMA
State
AZ
ZIP
85365
Mailing
4035 S. AVENUE A, YUMA, AZ 85365
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
928110
Employees
250
Ownership type
D

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1960.9

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 250 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2022
Abate by
Mar 30, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1960.9: Employer neglected its supervisory authority by not providing employees a place of employment that was free of recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause serious physical harm or death. Employer also failed to comply with the occupational safety and health standards applicable to their agency and with all rules, regulations, and orders issued by the head of the agency with respect to the agency occupational safety and health program.  CENTRAL PROCESSING CENTER - On or about November 21, 2021, and at times prior thereto,  facility management did not ensure that all uniformed personnel, regardless of vaccine status, wore N95 respirators in processing and detention settings as ordered by the Chief of U.S. Border Patrol in it's memo dated September 7, 2021.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2022
Abate by
Mar 30, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  (a)	CENTRAL PROCESSING CENTER- On or about December 13, 2021, and at times prior to, the employer required, but did not enforce the use of respiratory protection by a uniformed employee with a religious accommodation for face coverings. Uniformed personnel were required to wear respirators throughout their shifts, in congregated areas, while exposed to individuals with suspected or confirmed positive COVID-19.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 150 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2022
Abate by
Apr 26, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
Employee(s) using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator were not annually fit tested, or whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) was used:   (a)	CENTERAL PROCESSING CENTER: On or about November 21, 2021 and at times prior to, the employer did not ensure that employees on detail from Blythe Station had been provided with a fit test on the respirator style in use at the CPC, prior to being required to wear respirators. The employer required employees to wear N95 filtering facepiece respirators to protect against the SARS-CoV-2 virus while working near individuals  suspected and confirmed positive COVID-19.  (b)	CENTERAL PROCESSING CENTER:  On or about November 21, 2021 and at times prior to, the employer did not ensure a fit test was provided to all employees on detail from Yuma Station prior to being required to wear respirators. The employer required employees to wear N95 filtering facepiece respirators to protect against the SARS-CoV-2 virus while working near individuals  suspected and confirmed positive COVID-19.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2022
Abate by
Mar 30, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A):Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:  (a)	MULTI PURPOSE ROOM- On or about November 21, 2021, an employee who was required to wear N95 respirators for protection against SARS-CoV-2 virus, had facial hair between the sealing surface of the respirator and face.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 M02 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 169 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2022
Abate by
Apr 12, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(m)(2)(i):The employer did not establish a record of the qualitative and quantitative fit tests administered to an employee which included the information required by 29 CFR 1910.134(m)(2)(i)(A) through (m)(2)(i)(E):  (a)CENTERAL PROCESSING CENTER: The employers' fit test records did not include information on the type of respirator tested, the type of fit test performed, and pass or fail results of the test.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1904.4 A

Other-than-serious 18 instances 250 exposed
Issued
Mar 24, 2022
Abate by
Mar 31, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1904.4(a) as required by 29 CFR 1960.66(b): The employer did not record each work-related fatality, injury or illness case that resulted in the general recording criteria on the OSHA Form 300 or equivalent.   At the Central Processing Center located at 4035 S. Avenue A Yuma, AZ 85365:   a)  On or about September 29, 2021, for the work-related illness of an employee.  b) On or about September 29, 2021, for the work-related illness of an employee.  c) On or about October 1, 2021, for the work-related illness of an employee.  d) On or about October 2, 2021, for the work-related illness of an employee.  e) On or about October 5, 2021, for the work-related illness of an employee.  f) On or about October 6, 2021, for the work-related illness of an employee.  g) On or about October 6, 2021, for the work-related illness of an employee.  h) On or about October 7, 2021, for the work-related illness of an employee.  i) On or about October 8, 2021, for the work-related illness of an employee.  j) On or about October 9, 2021, for the work-related illness of an employee.  k) On or about October 9, 2021, for the work-related illness of an employee.  l) On or about October 9, 2021, for the work-related illness of an employee.  m) On or about October 9, 2021, for the work-related illness of an employee.  n) On or about October 10, 2021, for the work-related illness of an employee.  o) On or about October 11, 2021, for the work-related illness of an employee.  p) On or about October 13, 2021, for the work-related illness of an employee.  q) On or about October 13, 2021, for the work-related illness of an employee.  r) On or about October 15, 2021, for the work-related illness of an employee.  Abatement Certification and Documentation is required
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View U.S. Border Patrol's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345591903.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.