Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CHRISTENSEN LUMBER, INC

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of CHRISTENSEN LUMBER, INC in 20300 W 207TH ST, SPRING HILL, KS 66083 (NAICS 321214). OSHA activity number 345603799.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Christensen Lumber, INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Christensen Lumber, INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
20300 W 207TH ST
City
SPRING HILL
State
KS
ZIP
66083
Mailing
20300 W 207TH ST, SPRING HILL, KS 66083
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
321214
Employees
53
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 15, 2021
Abate by
Feb 3, 2022
Penalty
Initial $9,557 · Current $5,256 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.95(c)(1):The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:  Employees were exposed to noise hazards. Employees in the production area building trusses using pneumatic nail guns were exposed to continuous noise levels at 104.3% of permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 90.3 dBA), during the 301 minutes sampling period on November 4, 2021; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 179 minutes not sampled.    a)  The employer failed to administer a hearing conservation program. b)  The employer failed to implement a noise monitoring program to identify employees for inclusion in the hearing conservation program. c)  The employer failed to establish an audiometric testing program. d)  The employer failed to ensure that exposed employees used hearing protection. e)  The employer failed to institute a training program and ensure employees participate in the program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5256.35
  • — Z (S) $9557

1910.95 D01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 15, 2021
Abate by
Feb 3, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.95(d)(1):When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program:  Employees were exposed to noise hazards. Employees in the production area building trusses using pneumatic nail guns were exposed to continuous noise levels at 104.3% of permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 90.3 dBA), during the 301 minutes sampling period on November 4, 2021; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 179 minutes not sampled.  The employer failed to implement a noise monitoring program to identify employees for inclusion in the hearing conservation program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.95 G01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 15, 2021
Abate by
Feb 3, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.95(g)(1):The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided by 29 CFR 1910.95(g) by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels:  Employees were exposed to noise hazards. Employees in the production area building trusses using pneumatic nail guns were exposed to continuous noise levels at 104.3% of permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 90.3 dBA), during the 301 minutes sampling period on November 4, 2021; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 179 minutes not sampled.  The employer failed to establish an audiometric testing program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.95 I02 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 15, 2021
Abate by
Feb 3, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.95(i)(2)(i):The employer did not ensure that hearing protectors are worn by an employee who is required by 29 CFR 1910.95(b)(1) to wear personal protective equipment:  Employees were exposed to noise hazards. Employees in the production area building trusses using pneumatic nail guns were exposed to continuous noise levels at 104.3% of permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 90.3 dBA), during the 301 minutes sampling period on November 4, 2021; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 179 minutes not sampled.  The employer failed to ensure that exposed employees used hearing protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.95 K01

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 15, 2021
Abate by
Feb 3, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.95(k)(1):The employer did not institute a training program and ensure employee participation in the program:  Employees were exposed to noise hazards. Employees in the production area building trusses using pneumatic nail guns were exposed to continuous noise levels at 104.3% of permissible daily noise exposure (8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 90.3 dBA), during the 301 minutes sampling period on November 4, 2021; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 179 minutes not sampled.  The employer failed to institute a training program and ensure employees participate in the program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 F06 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 15, 2021
Penalty
Initial $5,461 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical.  Employees were exposed to chemical hazards. Employees  working at the web saw area were exposed to injury/illness from dermal, ingestion and inhalation hazards from exposure to chemicals including but not limited to antifreeze and diesel. The employer did not  ensure that the secondary container containing a mixture of the chemicals used to lubricate the web saw was labeled.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $5461

View Christensen Lumber, INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345603799.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.