Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: J.T. EATON & CO., INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of J.T. EATON & CO., INC. in 1393 HIGHLAND ROAD, TWINSBURG, OH 44087 (NAICS 424910). OSHA activity number 345611016.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch J.T. Eaton & CO., INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for J.T. Eaton & CO., INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1393 HIGHLAND ROAD
City
TWINSBURG
State
OH
ZIP
44087
Mailing
1393 HIGHLAND ROAD, TWINSBURG, OH 44087
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
424910
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 3, 2022
Abate by
Jan 21, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,121 · Current $1,873 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1):Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees:   On or about October 29, 2021, employees engaged in warehousing activities are exposed to crushing hazards when operating forklifts without using the provided seat belt, or other means of restraint, to ensure they remain safely inside the operator's compartment in the event of sudden unexpected motion. The employer did not ensure that forklift operator restraint devices or seat belts were used.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1873
  • — Z (S) $3121

1910.178 K01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 3, 2022
Abate by
Jan 21, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,121 · Current $1,873 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.178(k)(1): The brakes of highway truck(s) were not set and wheel chocks placed under the rear wheels to prevent truck(s) from rolling:   On or about October 29, 2021 the employer did not ensure employees loading product onto trucks did not ensure chocks were utilized on all trucks to keep them from rolling.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1873
  • — Z (S) $3121

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 3, 2022
Abate by
Jan 21, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,681 · Current $2,798 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.178(l)(1)(i):The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):  On or about September 27, 2021 the employer did not ensure employees operating Yale Electric Forklifts were trained prior to being allowed to operate. Employees work in a warehouse setting and are operate the forklifts for 8 hours daily.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2798
  • — Z (S) $4681

1910.178 L04 II A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 3, 2022
Abate by
Jan 21, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.178(l)(4)(ii)(A): Refresher training, including an evaluation of the effectiveness of that training, was not provided to the operator when the operator has been observed to operate the vehicle in an unsafe manner:   On or about September 28, 2021 the employer did not ensure after an employee operating  a Yale Electric Forklifts had an accident, he was not re-trained prior to being allowed to operate. Employees work in a warehouse setting and are operate the forklifts for 8 hours daily.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.23 B09

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 3, 2022
Abate by
Jan 21, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.23(b)(9):29 CFR 1910.23(b)(9): The employer did not ensure that ladders  are inspected before initial use in each work shift, and more frequently as necessary, to identify any visible defects that could cause employee injury:  On or about October 29, 2021, the employer failed to ensure employees utilizing ladders in the facility were inspecting them prior to use. Employees utilize ladders to gain access to product and during pallet builds.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.147 C07 I B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Jan 3, 2022
Abate by
Jan 28, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(7)(i)(B):Affected employees were not instructed in the purpose and use of the energy control procedure:  On or about October 29, 2021, the employer failed to ensure employees who work around equipment which is locked out, such as, but not limited too, powered industrial vehicles, shrink wrappers and mixing machines, were trained as affected employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.157 E02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Jan 3, 2022
Abate by
Jan 21, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.157(e)(2): Portable fire extinguishers were not visually inspected at least monthly:   On or about October 29, 2021, the employer failed to ensure fire extinguishers in the facility were inspected monthly to ensure they should function properly.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.157 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Jan 3, 2022
Abate by
Jan 21, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.157(g)(1):An educational program was not provided for all employees to familiarize them with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting:  On or about October 29, 2021, the employer failed to ensure employees were trained on how to operate fire extinguishers, nor trained in an alternative procedures of evacuation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View J.T. Eaton & CO., INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345611016.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.