SAIPAN, MP —
OSHA Inspection: SEAFIX INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SEAFIX INC. in LOWER BASE INDUSTRIAL PARK, SAIPAN, MP 96950 (NAICS 488390). OSHA activity number 345623946.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SEAFIX INC.
- Site address
- LOWER BASE INDUSTRIAL PARK
- City
- SAIPAN
- State
- MP
- ZIP
- 96950
- Mailing
- P O BOX 5892 CHRB, SAIPAN, MP 96950
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 488390
- Employees
- 40
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.106 E02 IV A
- Issued
- Jan 7, 2022
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $2,867 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(2)(iv)(a): Flammable liquids were not kept in covered containers when not in use. Bench in the middle of the shop: An open plastic coffee container with gasoline was on the bench near the milling and lathe machines. Employees were exposed to fire hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2867.2
- — Z (S) $4096
1910.178 P01
- Issued
- Jan 7, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $2,867 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1):Powered industrial truck(s) with defect(s) or in any way unsafe had not been withdrawn from service until restored to safe operating condition(s): Parking lot: A Hyster powered industrial truck with an unserviceable horn was used to load equipment and supplies onto trucks, exposing employees to crushed-by and struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2867.2
- — Z (S) $4096
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jan 7, 2022
- Abate by
- Feb 3, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,096 · Current $2,867 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: a. In the machine shop: The Bridgeport milling machine used for part repair and fabrication was not equipped with a chuck guard. Employees were exposed to rotating part hazards. b. In the machine shop: A Victor lathe used for part repair and fabrication was not equipped with a chuck guard. Employees were exposed to rotating part hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2867.2
- — Z (S) $4096
1910.157 E02
- Issued
- Jan 7, 2022
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(2): Portable fire extinguishers were not visually inspected at least monthly: a. Office area: The fire extinguisher monthly inspection was not performed for the month of September, exposing employees to fire hazards. b. Machine shop: The fire extinguisher monthly inspection was not performed for the month of September, exposing employees to fire hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- Jan 7, 2022
- Abate by
- Feb 3, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years: The reevaluation to ensure power industrial truck operators were still proficient to safely operate powered industrial trucks was not conducted, exposing employees to crushed and struck by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 F06 II
- Issued
- Jan 7, 2022
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical: Bench in the middle of the shop: Gasoline was stored in an unlabeled coffee container, exposing employees to chemical hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Seafix INC.
View Seafix INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 488390)
More inspections in MP
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345623946.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.