Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JOE ROBERTS

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of JOE ROBERTS in 951 HWY 30, HEYBURN, ID 83336 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345625529.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch JOE Roberts — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for JOE Roberts is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JOE ROBERTS
Site address
951 HWY 30
City
HEYBURN
State
ID
ZIP
83336
Mailing
821 WEST 400 SOUTH, HEYBURN, ID 83336
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B10

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 2, 2022
Abate by
May 26, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(10):Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system.  Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system.  a) On or about November 2, 2021; employees were exposed to falls of approximately 35 feet while performing roofing activities including shoveling and transporting rock with a motorized hopper, to a chute located at the edge of the roof.   Note: Abatement certification AND documentation are required for this item.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4351

1926.502 D06 V

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 2, 2022
Abate by
May 26, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351
29 CFR  1926.502(d)(6)(v):A snaphook not of the locking type was engaged (i) directly to webbing, rope or wire rope; (ii) to each other (iii) to a Dee-ring to which another snaphook or other connector is attached;(iv) to a horizontal lifeline; or (v) to any object which is incompatibly shaped or dimensioned in relation to the snaphook such that unintentional disengagement could occur by the connected object being able to depress the snaphook keeper and release itself.  a) On or about November 2, 2021; a rope being used as part of a personal fall arrest system had been looped over a pipe being used as an anchor, and latched onto itself.   Note: Abatement certification AND documentation ARE required for this item.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4351

1926.502 D15

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 2, 2022
Abate by
May 26, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.502(d)(15):  Anchorage points used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment were not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee.  a) On or about November 2, 2021 a wire anchor being used as part of a personal fall arrest system had been secured to a 2", galvanized steel pipe without knowledge if the pipe could withstand 5000 pounds of force.   Note: Abatement certification AND documentation ARE required for this item.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 F01 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 2, 2022
Abate by
May 26, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.502(f)(1)(ii):29 CFR 1926.502(f)(1)(ii):  When mechanical equipment was being used, the warning line was not erected at least 6 feet (1.8 m) from the roof edge which is parallel to the direction of mechanical equipment operation, and at least 10 feet (3.1 m) from the roof edge which is perpendicular to the direction of mechanical equipment operation.  a) On or about November 2, 2021; an employee was operating a Whiteman MQ,  WBH-16 power buggy near a warning line that was set within 1 foot of the edge of the roof.   Note: Abatement certification AND documentation are required for this item.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View JOE Roberts's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345625529.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.