Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LUIS CONTRERAS

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LUIS CONTRERAS in 2710 RASPBERRY SUNSET CIRCLE, TEXAS CITY, TX 77591 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 345638795.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Luis Contreras — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Luis Contreras is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LUIS CONTRERAS
Site address
2710 RASPBERRY SUNSET CIRCLE
City
TEXAS CITY
State
TX
ZIP
77591
Mailing
527 COMILLE STREET, HOUSTON, TX 77022
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

13 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2022
Abate by
Mar 4, 2022
Penalty
Initial $1,865 · Current $1,865
29 CFR  1926.100(a):  Employees exposed to possible head injury from falling or flying objects or from impact with hand tools, equipment and building materials during construction operations were not wearing hard hats:  a) At this jobsite, an employee was exposed to struck-by hazards while working on the ground and from the 1st buck of a scaffold while not wearing a hard hat.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1865

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 24, 2022
Abate by
Feb 28, 2022
Penalty
Initial $1,865 · Current $1,865
29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1):  The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met (Construction Reference: 1926.59):  a) At the jobsite, employees were exposed to eye and respiratory irritation hazards when the employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program. Employees use hazardous substances such as Texas Lehigh Masonry Cement, a corrosive.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1865

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 24, 2022
Abate by
Feb 17, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.1200(g)(1):  Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use (Construction Reference:  1926.59):  a) At the jobsite, employees were exposed to eye and respiratory irritation and chemical burns when the employer did not keep a copy of the safety data sheets for the bricks and Texas Lehigh Masonry Cement, a corrosive.  Employees are exposed to crystalline silica when cutting brick.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 24, 2022
Abate by
Feb 28, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.1200(h)(1):  Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area (Construction Reference: 1926.59):  a) At the jobsite, employees were exposed to respiratory and eye irritation, and chemical burns when the employer did not instruct employees how to recognize and minimize those hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 H02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 24, 2022
Abate by
Feb 17, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.451(h)(2)(ii):  A toe board was not erected along the edge of platforms more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower levels for a distance sufficient to protect employees below:  a) At the jobsite, an employee was exposed to struck-by hazards from falling bricks and tools while working from the ground and first level of a tubular welded frame scaffold that did not have toe boards installed.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 24, 2022
Abate by
Feb 17, 2022
Penalty
Initial $1,865 · Current $1,865
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1):  Employees did not use eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  a) At the jobsite, an employee was exposed to eye irritation and chemical burns when he did not wear safety glasses while using Lehigh Type S masonry cement.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1865

1926.405 G02 III

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 24, 2022
Abate by
Feb 17, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,108 · Current $3,108
29 CFR  1926.405(g)(2)(iii):  Flexible cords were not used in continuous lengths without splice or tap:  a) At the jobsite, employees were exposed to electrical shock hazards while operating a Dewalt 120 volt, 15 amp, chop saw with a spliced extension cord.   b) At the jobsite, employees were exposed to electrical shock hazards while operating a 120 volt electric cement mixer with a spliced cord.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3108

1926.405 G02 IV

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 24, 2022
Abate by
Feb 17, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.405(g)(2)(iv):  Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:  a) At the jobsite, an employee was exposed to electric shock hazards while operating a Dewalt 120 volt, 15 amp chop saw using a flexible electric cord with strain relief damage.   b) At the jobsite, an employee was exposed to electric shock hazards while operating  a 120 volt cement mixer using a flexible electric cord with strain relief damage.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.416 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 24, 2022
Abate by
Feb 17, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.416(e)(1):  Worn or frayed electric cords or cables were used:  a) At the jobsite, an employee was exposed to electric shock hazards while operating a 120 volt, 15 amp, Dewalt chop saw using a flexible extension cord that was worn and frayed.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 24, 2022
Abate by
Feb 17, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,108 · Current $3,108
29 CFR  1926.451(c)(2):  Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames,  or uprights did not bear on base plates and mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:  a) At the jobsite, employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 14-feet and greater when they worked from a tubular welded frame scaffold that did not have scaffold legs and base plates installed.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3108

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 24, 2022
Abate by
Feb 17, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,108 · Current $3,108
29 CFR  1926.451(e)(1):  A means of access for scaffold platforms more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, such as portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from another scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used:  a) At the jobsite, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 7-feet to 14-feet when a ladder was not installed on the tubular welded frame scaffold.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3108

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 24, 2022
Abate by
Feb 17, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,108 · Current $3,108
29 CFR  1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section:  a) At the jobsite, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 14-feet and greater when they worked from a tubular welded frame scaffold that did not have guard and end rails installed.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3108

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 24, 2022
Abate by
Feb 17, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):  Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system:  a)  At the jobsite, an employee was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 17-feet 5-inches and greater while working on the roof of a house without using fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View Luis Contreras's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345638795.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.