SPRINGFIELD, MA —
OSHA Inspection: EDYN PEREZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EDYN PEREZ in 4 REVERE ST, SPRINGFIELD, MA 01115 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345644454.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- EDYN PEREZ
- Site address
- 4 REVERE ST
- City
- SPRINGFIELD
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 01115
- Mailing
- 40 ORCHARD ST, SPRINGFIELD, MA 01107
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Jun 17, 2022
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $349 · Current $349
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1):The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that each cited violation has been abated: As of June 17, 2022, the Employer had not certified to OSHA that the abatement was completed for the violations from Inspection 1564445, issued on 2/28/2022 with a final order date of 3/24/2022.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $349
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Jun 17, 2022
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $349 · Current $349
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1):The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required: As of June 17, 2022, the Employer had not submitted to the Agency the abatement documentation required for the violation issued on 2/28/2022 on which it was indicated that such abatement documentation was required to be submitted to the Agency.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $349
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Feb 28, 2022
- Abate by
- Mar 24, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system: 4 Revere St., Springfield, MA: On or about November 18, 2021, 3 employees were observed engaged in residential roofing activities more than 10 feet above the next lower level(ground) and were not protected from falling by either means of guard rail systems, safety net systems or a personal fall arrest system. Specific abatement documentation that this violation has been corrected must be provided within 10 days of the abatement in accordance with 29CFR1903.19(d)(1).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4351
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Feb 28, 2022
- Abate by
- Mar 24, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards: 4 Revere St., Springfield, MA: On or about November 18, 2021, employee(s) were exposed to fall hazards are part of their assigned duties and the employer had not trained them prior to exposure to these hazards in topics such as but not limited to recognition of fall hazards, dangers of fall hazards and procedures each employee must take to prevent or minimize risk of such exposures. Specific abatement documentation that this violation has been corrected must be provided within 10 days of the abatement in accordance with 29CFR1903.19(d)(1).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4351
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- Feb 28, 2022
- Abate by
- Mar 24, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1):The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record: 4 Revere St., Springfield, MA: On or about November 18, 2021, the employer had not prepared a written certification record of fall protection training which included the name or other identity of the person trained, the signature of the person trained, date(s) the training was completed and the signature of the person who conducted the training. Specific abatement documentation that this violation has been corrected must be provided within 10 days of the abatement in accordance with 29CFR1903.19(d)(1).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4351
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Feb 28, 2022
- Abate by
- Mar 24, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access: 4 Revere St., Springfield, MA: On or about November 18, 2021, employees utilizing a portable extension ladder to gain access to an upper landing (roof) had not extended the end of the ladder at least 3 feet above the upper landing (eave) exposing them to fall hazards. Specific abatement documentation that this violation has been corrected must be provided within 10 days of the abatement in accordance with 29CFR1903.19(d)(1).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4351
1926.1053 B05 I
- Issued
- Feb 28, 2022
- Abate by
- Mar 24, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i):Non-self-supporting ladders were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder is approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support): 4 Revere St., Springfield, MA: On or about November 18, 2021, the employer had not ensured that employee(s) using portable extension ladders to access an upper level and were installed in manner in which the working angle did not exceed a ratio of 4:1 or one quarter the working length of the ladder. The ladder was set up at a 3:1 (42%) ratio exposing employees to ladder displacement and fall from height hazards. Specific abatement documentation that this violation has been corrected must be provided within 10 days of the abatement in accordance with 29CFR1903.19(d)(1).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4351
More inspections at Edyn Perez
View Edyn Perez's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345644454.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.