Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CORLE BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of CORLE BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC. in 404 SARAH FURNACE ROAD, IMLER, PA 16655 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 345733000.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Corle Building Systems, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Corle Building Systems, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
404 SARAH FURNACE ROAD
City
IMLER
State
PA
ZIP
16655
Mailing
404 SARAH FURNACE ROAD, IMLER, PA 16655
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332312
Employees
260
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 D03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2022
Abate by
Jun 15, 2022
Penalty
Initial $9,116 · Current $5,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.147(d)(3):All energy isolating devices that were needed to control the energy to the machine or equipment were not physically located and operated in such a manner as to isolate the machine or equipment from the energy source(s):  (a)  Facility:  On or about January 7, 2022, the Bradbury standing seam roof machine was not locked/tagged out before the operator began to clean the in-running rollers.  Both the front guard and the back guard over the rollers were up in the vertical position and the in-running rollers were running.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $9116

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2022
Abate by
Jun 30, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(4)(i):Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:  (a)  Facility:  On or about January 7, 2022, the company did not develop written lockout/tagout procedures for  the Bradbury standing seam roof (SSR) machine nor for any of the other approximately 30 machines in the facility that are hard wired.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C06

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2022
Abate by
Jun 30, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(6):The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirements of this standard are being followed.  The periodic inspection must: [A] be performed by an authorized employee other than the ones utilizing the energy control procedure being inspected.   [B] be conducted to correct any deviations or inadequacies identified. [C] where lockout is used for energy control, include a review, between the inspector and each authorized employee, of that employee's responsibilities under the energy control procedure being inspected. [D] where tag-out is used for energy control, include a review between the inspector and each authorized and affected employee, of that employee's responsibilities under the energy control procedure being inspected, and the elements set forth in paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of this section:  (a)  Facility:  On or about January 7, 2022, the employer had not conducted a periodic inspection of its energy control program for at least the last two years.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 F02 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2022
Abate by
Jun 30, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.147(f)(2)(i):When outside servicing personnel were engaged in activities in a facility, the onsite employer and the outside employer did not inform each other of their respective lockout or tagout procedures:  (a)  Facility:  On or about December 23, 2021, an outside contractor was working on the Bradbury standing seam roof (SSR) machine and the onsite employer did not coordinate with the outside employer to inform each other of their respective lockout/tagout procedures.  The onsite employer did not have any machine specific procedures for this machine.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A03 II

Willful Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2022
Abate by
Jun 9, 2022
Penalty
Initial $145,027 · Current $75,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.212(a)(3)(ii):Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):  (a)  Facility:  On or about January 7, 2022, there were three uncovered openings (approximately 15 inch wide by 12 inch high, 8 1/2 inch wide by 7 1/2 inches high and 11 1/4 inches wide by 12 inches high) in the expandable metal guard to the in-running rollers to the Bradbury standing seam roll form (SSR) machine.  Sets of in running rollers were approximately 13 inches away from these openings.  An employee operates this machine about 4 days a week.  (b)  Facility:  On or about  January 7, 2022, the interlocks to the front and back expandable metal guards to the Bradbury (standing seam roof machine)  set of rollers were not working properly in that it allowed the guards to be opened and the rollers would continue to run.  An employee suffered an amputation of a finger when he went to clean the in-running rollers with a rag.  The rag got caught in a set of in-running rollers and amputated part of one finger and badly damaged another finger.  (c)  Facility:  On or about January 7, 2022, the front guard (closest to the machine operators controls) and the back guard, that were over the in-running rollers to the running Bradbury SSR (standing seam roof machine) were opened and in a vertical position.  This exposed numbers of sets of rollers to the operator or other employees passing by the machine.  This machine was normally run this way with the front expandable metal guard in the open (vertical) position and often the back expandable guard also run in the open position.  Management had the operator keep especially the front expandable metal guard open so that it would be easier to count the number of sheets of product that the machine was making.  This condition exposed employees to in-running nip points from the in-running rollers that would cold form the flat coil of steel into standing seam roof panels.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (W) $75000
  • — Z (W) $145027

1910.145 C02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2022
Abate by
Jun 9, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.145(c)(2)(i):  Caution signs were not used to warn against potential hazards or to caution against unsafe practices:  (a)  Facility:  On or about January 7, 2022, there were no caution signs in place at the three openings in the expandable metal guards for the Bradbury rollers to the Bradbury standing seam roll form machine.  In addition, there were no signs informing employees to keep the two expandable guards in the fully closed position whenever the Bradbury standing seam roll  forming machine  is being run.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.145 C02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 3, 2022
Abate by
Jun 15, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.145(c)(2)(ii):  Employees were not instructed that caution signs indicate a possible hazard against which proper precautions should be taken:  (a)  Facility:  On or about January 7, 2022, the employer did not train employees that caution signs indicate a potential hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Corle Building Systems, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345733000.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.