SAN ANTONIO, TX —
OSHA Inspection: TEC
Special Programs inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a special Programs safety inspection of TEC in 11207 W 1604 N, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78254 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 345744742.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TEC
- Site address
- 11207 W 1604 N
- City
- SAN ANTONIO
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 78254
- Mailing
- 8102 GLEN LARK, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78239
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Special Programs (K)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- May 23, 2022
- Abate by
- Jun 10, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $2,486 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: 11207 W 1604N San Antonio, Texas 78254: On or about January 25, 2022, an employee was exposed to fall hazards while utilizing a telescoping boom lift to conduct stucco masonry work from height without being trained on the hazards of a fall.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $1000
- — Z (S) $2486
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- May 23, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $2,486 · Current $1,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v):A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift:Note: As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated. 11207 W 1604N San Antonio, Texas 78254: On or about January 25, 2022, an employee was exposed to fall hazards while utilizing a telescoping boom lift to conduct stucco masonry work without wearing fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1250
- — Z (S) $2486
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- May 23, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $3,729 · Current $1,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1):Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: 11207 W 1604N San Antonio, Texas 78254: On or about January 25, 2022, an employee was exposed to fall hazards while conducting stucco masonry work at heights greater than 6 feet without wearing fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1250
- — Z (S) $3729
More inspections at TEC
View TEC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345744742.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.