OSHA Inspection: LUIYI TAVERAS GARCIA

Issued

Nov 17, 2022

Abate by

Dec 21, 2022

Penalty

Initial $384 · Current $384

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  (a) Establishment:  As of November 17, 2022, the employer had not certified to OSHA that the abatement had been completed for Citation  2, Items 1 and 2 from inspection number 1580654, issued on 8/11/2022, with a final order date of 9/16/2022.

Issued

Nov 17, 2022

Abate by

Dec 21, 2022

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  (a) Establishment:  As of November 17, 2022, the employer had not provided the required abatement documentation to OSHA for Citation 2, Items 1 and 2 from inspection number 1580654, issued on 8/11/2022, with a final order date of 9/16/2022.

Issued

Aug 11, 2022

Penalty

Initial $3,419 · Current $3,419

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.100(a):Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  (a) Jobsite:   On or about 2/22/22 employees  utilizing manual and power tools for the removal of ceiling and wall materials including plaster, plaster lathe, drywall and tin panels were not provided with protective helmets.  (b) Jobsite:   On or about 3/7/22 employees utilizing manual and power tools to install ceiling  and wall joists and drywall and dry wall support framing and electrical fixtures  were not provided with protective helmets.

Issued

Aug 11, 2022

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.102(a)(2): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used eye protection that provided side protection when there is a hazard from flying objects:   (a) Jobsite:   On or about 2/22/22 employees  utilizing manual and power tools for the removal of ceiling and wall materials including plaster, plaster lathe, drywall and tin panels were not provided with eye protection.  (b) Jobsite:   On or about 3/7/22 employees utilizing manual and power tools to install ceiling  and wall joists and drywall and dry wall support framing and electrical fixtures  were not provided with eye protection.

Issued

Aug 11, 2022

Abate by

Sep 27, 2022

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1591

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(1)(i): Each employer who had a workplace or operation covered by 29 CFR 1926.62 did not initially determine if any employee was exposed to lead at or above the action level of 30 micrograms per cubic meter of air (30 ug/m3) calculated as an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA):  (a) Jobsite:   On or about 2/22/22 the employer did not perform an employee lead exposure assessment, as required in 29 CFR 1926.62(d) when their employees were performing work on lead containing painted wood trim.  (b) Jobsite:   On or about 3/7/22 the employer did not perform an employee lead exposure assessment, as required in 29 CFR 1926.62(d) when their employees were performing work on lead containing painted wood trim .

Issued

Aug 11, 2022

Abate by

Sep 27, 2022

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 1591

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(i): Until the employer performed an employee exposure assessment, as required in 29 CFR 1926.62(d), and documented that the employee(s) performing any of the listed tasks was not exposed above the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL), the employer did not treat affected employee(s) as if they were exposed above the PEL, and not in excess of ten times the PEL, and did not implement employee protective measures prescribed in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v):  (a) Jobsite:  On or about 2/22/22 the employer did not perform an employee exposure assessment, as required in 29 CFR 1926.62(d), and document that the employee(s) performing demolition tasks were not exposed above the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) for lead, and the employer had not implemented employee protective measures prescribed in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v), including respiratory protection, biological monitoring and appropriate personal protective equipment for all employee who were preforming work on painted wood trim.  (b) Jobsite:   On or about 3/7/22 the employer did not perform an employee exposure assessment, as required in 29 CFR 1926.62(d), and document that the employee(s) performing demolition tasks were not exposed above the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) for lead, and the employer had not implemented employee protective measures prescribed in 29 CFR 1926.62(d)(2)(v), including respiratory protection, biological monitoring and appropriate personal protective equipment for all employee who were preforming work on painted wood trim.