Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MARTIN GOMEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MARTIN GOMEZ in 3129 ELIZABETH LANE, COPPER CANYON, TX 75077 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 345845457.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Martin Gomez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Martin Gomez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MARTIN GOMEZ
Site address
3129 ELIZABETH LANE
City
COPPER CANYON
State
TX
ZIP
75077
Mailing
4228 BROKEN ARROW, FORT WORTH, TX 76137
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 2, 2022
Abate by
Jul 1, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,351 · Current $2,611 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(2):The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s).  On or about December 27, 2021, at a jobsite located at 3129 Elizabeth Lane, Copper Canyon, TX; the employer did not initiated and maintained frequent and regular job site inspections while employees were engaged in residential roofing work, exposed to a fall hazard, by a competent person(s).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2610.6
  • — Z (S) $4351

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 2, 2022
Abate by
Jul 1, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,729 · Current $2,237 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1):Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical agents.  On or about December 27, 2021, employees using pneumatic nail guns were not provided with and wearing eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2237.4
  • — Z (S) $3729

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 2, 2022
Abate by
Jul 1, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,351 · Current $2,611 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502.   On or about December 27, 2021, at a jobsite located at 3129 Elizabeth Lane, Copper Canyon, TX; employees who performed residential roofing work, without fall protection, were exposed to a fall hazard greater than 6-feet to the lower level.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2610.6
  • — Z (S) $4351

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 2, 2022
Abate by
Jul 1, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1):The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards.  On or about December 27, 2021, the employer did not furnish evidence of a training program for employees that were exposed to fall hazard(s) associated with working from heights.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 5 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 2, 2022
Abate by
Jul 1, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,351 · Current $2,611 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1):Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access.  On or about December 27, 2021, at a jobsite located at 3129 Elizabeth Lane, Copper Canyon, TX; employees used five (5) portable ladders to access the roof of a two-story home.  The ladders were not extended at least 3-feet above the upper the landing surface exposing employees to fall hazards.   a) Extension ladder located on the west side of the home - extended only two feet above upper landing surface.  b) Extension ladder located on the southwest side of the home - extended only one foot above upper landing surface.  c) Extension ladder located on the southeast side of the home - extended only one foot above upper landing surface.  d) Extension ladder located on the east side of the home - extended only one foot  above upper landing surface.  e) Extension ladder located on the northeast side of the home - extended only one foot above upper landing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2610.6
  • — Z (S) $4351

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 2, 2022
Abate by
Jul 1, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(4):Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed.  On or about December 27, 2021, and times prior there to, the employer did not ensure extension ladders were used in accordance with the manufactures design to access the roof.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 2, 2022
Abate by
Jul 1, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1060(a):The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.  On or about December 27, 2021, and times prior there to, the employer did not provide ladder safety training program being communicated to employees in order to train the employees to recognize and mitigate hazards related to ladder safety.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jun 2, 2022
Abate by
Jul 1, 2022
Penalty
Initial $349 · Current $209 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer.  On or about December 27, 2021, and times prior there to,  the employer did not provide signed and written training certification records for the employee(s) that attended safety training, the dates of the training, the signature of the employer,  nor the signature of the person that conducted the safety training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $209.4
  • — Z (O) $349

View Martin Gomez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345845457.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.