Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CUMAR INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of CUMAR INC. in 69 NORMAN STREET SUITE 4, EVERETT, MA 02149 (NAICS 327991). OSHA activity number 345858062.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Cumar INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Cumar INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
CUMAR INC.
Site address
69 NORMAN STREET SUITE 4
City
EVERETT
State
MA
ZIP
02149
Mailing
69 NORMAN STREET, EVERETT, MA 02149
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
327991
Employees
75
Ownership type
A

14 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 15, 2022
Abate by
Oct 12, 2022
Penalty
Initial $10,151 · Current $4,000 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use:  Location: Fabrication Area 69 Norman Street Everett, MA  On or about 3/25/2022,  a written respiratory protection program was not developed or implemented for required usage of Moldex 7000 pre-assembled tight fitting half face respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4000
  • — Z (S) $10151

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 15, 2022
Abate by
Oct 12, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1):The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace  Location: Fabrication Area 69 Norman Street Everett, MA  On or about 3/25/22, employees required to don Moldex 7000 pre-assembled tight fitting half face respirators with P100 filters were not provided medical evaluations before required use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 15, 2022
Abate by
Oct 20, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(1):The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT).  Location Fabrication Area 69 Norman Street Everett, MA  On or about 3/25/22, employees required to don Moldex 7000 half face tight fitting respirators with P100 filters were not provided a qualitative or quantitative fit test.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 15, 2022
Abate by
Oct 20, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable, and effective annual training to employees who were required to use respirators.  Location: Fabrication area  69 Norman Street Everett, MA  On or about 3/25/22, employees required to don the Moldex 7000 half face respirators were not provided comprehensive and work-specific respirator training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1053 C

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 15, 2022
Abate by
Mar 31, 2023
Penalty
Initial $10,151 · Current $4,000 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1910.1053(c): The employer did not ensure that no employee was exposed to an airborne concentration of respirable crystalline silica in excess of 50 micrograms per cubic meter, calculated as an 8-hour TWA:   Location: Fabrication area  69 Norman Street Everett, MA  On or about 4/19/22, the employer did not ensure that employees were not exposed to respirable crystalline silica (RCS) concentrations greater than fifty micrograms per cubic meter of air averaged over an eight-hour period.    A) An employee conducting handheld fabrication work was exposed to airborne concentration of respirable crystalline silica at an 8-hour, time-weighted average of 491 micrograms per cubic meter of air, approximately 9.82 times the permissible exposure limit of 50 micrograms per cubic meter of air.   B) An employee conducting handheld fabrication work was exposed to airborne concentration of respirable crystalline silica at an 8-hour, time-weighted average of 85 micrograms per cubic meter of air, approximately 1.7 times the permissible exposure limit of 50 micrograms per cubic meter of air.
Recent events (3)
  • — P (S) $4000
  • — I (S) $4000
  • — Z (S) $10151

1910.1053 D06 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Sep 15, 2022
Abate by
Nov 2, 2022
Penalty
Initial $10,151 · Current $3,000 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1910.1053(d)(6)(i):Within 15 working days after completing an exposure assessment in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section, the employer did not individually notify each affected employee in writing of the results of that assessment or post the results in an appropriate location accessible to all affected employees:  Location: Handheld and Machine Fabrication areas 69 Norman Street Everett, MA   On or about 4/19/22, an affected employee included in a 2018 January exposure assessessment recorded an occupational overexposure to respirable crystalline silica of 120 micrograms per cubic meter of air, was not notified of the sampling results within 15 working days after completing the exposure assessment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $10151

1910.1053 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 15, 2022
Abate by
Oct 12, 2022
Penalty
Initial $10,151 · Current $4,000 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1910.1053(e)(1):The employer did not establish a regulated area wherever an employee's exposure to airborne concentrations of respirable crystalline silica was, or could have been reasonably expected to be, in excess of the PEL:  Location: Handheld fabrication area  69 Norman Street Everett, MA  On or about 4/19/22, a regulated respirable crystalline silica area was not established for the fabrication area where employees personal TWA respirable crystalline silica samples exceeded the PEL.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4000
  • — Z (S) $10151

1910.1053 H02 I

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 15, 2022
Abate by
Nov 2, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1910.1053(h)(2)(i):The employer allowed compressed air to be used to clean clothing or surfaces where such activity could contribute to employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica without being used in conjunction with a ventillation system to capture blown dust:  Location: Fabrication area   A) On or about 3/25/22, employee(s) used compressed air to clean countertop surface holes and work clothes where such activity could contribute to employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica without being used in conjunction with ventilation system to capture blown dust.   Location: Fabrication area   B) On or about 4/19/22, employee(s) used compressed air to clean countertop surface holes and work clothes where such activity could contribute to employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica without being used in conjunction with ventilation system to capture blown dust.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1053 J02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 15, 2022
Abate by
Nov 2, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1910.1053(j)(2): The employer did not post signs at all entrances to regulated areas that bear the following legend:  DANGER  RESPIRABLE CRYSTALLINE SILICA  MAY CAUSE CANCER  CAUSES DAMAGE TO LUNGS  WEAR RESPIRATORY PROTECTION IN THIS AREA  AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL ONLY  Location: Fabrication area  69 Norman Street Everett, MA  On or about 4/19/2022, a respirable crystalline silica danger sign stating DANGER  RESPIRABLE CRYSTALLINE SILICA MAY CAUSE CANCER CAUSES DAMAGE TO LUNGS WEAR RESPIRATORY PROTECTION IN THIS AREA AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL ONLY was not posted at entrance to the handheld fabrication area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1053 F01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 15, 2022
Abate by
Jan 31, 2023
Penalty
Initial $10,151 · Current $4,000 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1910.1053(f)(1):The employer did not use engineering and work practice controls to reduce and maintain employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica to or below the PEL, unless the employer can demonstrate that such controls are not feasible:  Location: Handheld Fabrication Area  On or about 4/19, 2022, adequate engineering and work practice controls were not utilized to reduce and maintain employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica to or below the PEL.   A) The Airmax ventilation system was positioned along the surronding walls and away from the countertop surface fabrication point of operation.   Location: Handheld Fabrication Area  On or about 3/25/2022 and 4/19, 2022, work practice controls were not utilized to reduce and maintain employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica to or below the PEL.   B)  Employees utilized compressed air guns without engineering controls affixed to clean work clothing and countertop holes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4000
  • — Z (S) $10151

1910.1053 H01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 15, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1910.1053(h)(1):The employer allowed dry sweeping or dry brushing where such activity could contribute to employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica unless wet sweeping, HEPA-filtered vacuuming or other methods that minimize the likelihood of exposure were feasible:  Location: Fabrication Area   On or about 4/19/2022, an employee dry swept respirable crystalline silica containing floor dust into a dust pan without wet sweeping, HEPA-filtered vacuum, or other methods that minimize the likelihood of airborne exposure.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1053 J03 I A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 15, 2022
Abate by
Nov 2, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1910.1053(j)(3)(i)(A): The employer did not ensure that each employee covered by this section could demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the health hazards associated with exposure to respirable crystalline silica:   Location: Fabrication area 69 Norman Street Everett, MA   On or about 4/19/2022, each employee working in the fabrication area could not demonstrate knowledge of the health hazards associated with airborne exposures to respirable crystalline silica.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1053 F02 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 15, 2022
Abate by
Oct 20, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1910.1053(f)(2)(i):The employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan:  Location: 69 Norman Street Everett, MA  On 4/19/2022, components of the written respirable crystalline silica exposure control plan such as utilizing effective ventilation devices and wet cutting were not implemented for the handheld fabrication area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1053 I01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 15, 2022
Abate by
Nov 2, 2022
Penalty
Initial $10,151 · Current $3,000 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9000

29 CFR  1910.1053(i)(1)(i): The employer did not make medical surveillance available at no cost to each employee, and at a reasonable time and place, for each employee who has been occupationally exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level for 30 or more days per year:   Location: Fabrication area 69 Norman Street Everett, MA  On or about 4/19/2022, medical surveillance examinations were not made available to five (5) fabricating employees who had been occupationally exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level for 30 or more days per year.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3000
  • — Z (S) $10151

View Cumar INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345858062.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.