PELHAM, NH —
OSHA Inspection: DAVE SENECAL
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of DAVE SENECAL in MAMMOTH RD., PELHAM, NH 03076 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 345862536.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DAVE SENECAL
- Site address
- MAMMOTH RD.
- City
- PELHAM
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03076
- Mailing
- 79 WINSLOW LANE, CANDIA, NH 03034
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Nov 18, 2022
- Abate by
- Dec 23, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $349 · Current $349
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section: The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation No. 1 Item No(s). 2a, 2b, 3, 5, and 7 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent November 1, 2022.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $349
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Nov 18, 2022
- Abate by
- Jan 9, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $349 · Current $349
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. 29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section: The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation No. 1 Item No(s). 1a, 1b, 4 and 6 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent November 1, 2022.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $349
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2022
- Abate by
- Jun 21, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s) Site- Employees were not protected from fall and struck by hazards where the employer did not provide for frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite to be conducted by a competent person.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4351
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2022
- Abate by
- Jun 21, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1):The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part: Site- Employees were not protected from fall and struck by hazards where the employer did not maintain an accident prevention program.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 A06
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2022
- Abate by
- Jul 5, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $3,108 · Current $3,108
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(6):Scaffolds were not designed by a qualified person: Site - Employees were exposed to fall hazards while working from a makeshift scaffold, which was not designed by a qualified person, to install roofing rafters to the ridge beam.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3108
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2022
- Abate by
- Jul 5, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person: Site - Employees were exposed to fall hazards while working from a makeshift scaffold, which was not erected by a competent person, to install roofing rafters to the ridge beam.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 B02
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2022
- Abate by
- Jul 5, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $3,108 · Current $3,108
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2):Except as provided in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (b)(2)(ii) of this section, each scaffold platform and/or walkway was not at least 18 inches (46 cm) wide: Site - Employees were exposed to fall hazards while working from a makeshift scaffold, which had a working platform width of only 12 inches, to install roofing rafters to the ridge beam.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3108
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2022
- Abate by
- Jul 5, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1):Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section: A. Site - Employees were exposed to fall hazards while installing roofing rafters to the ridge beam from a makeshift scaffold which had fall distances of approximately 11 feet to the second story deck and approximately 20 feet to the concrete slab in areas where the second story was not decked.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4351
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2022
- Abate by
- Jul 5, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $3,108 · Current $3,108
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards: Site - Employees who were exposed to fall hazards while working from a makeshift scaffold to install roofing rafters to the ridge beam were not adequately trained to recognize and minimize hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3108
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2022
- Abate by
- Jul 5, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $4,351
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a. Site - Employees were exposed to falls of approximately 12 feet while working from the second story of a new construction home to install roofing rafters where the entire back side of the building was not provided with guardrails. b. Site - Employees were exposed to falls of approximately 12 feet while working from the second story of a new construction home to install roofing rafters where window openings were not provided with guardrails. c. Site - Employees were exposed to falls of approximately 10 feet while working from the second story of a new construction home to install roofing rafters where floor openings were not provided with guardrails.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4351
1926.1052 C01 I
- Issued
- Jun 14, 2022
- Abate by
- Jul 5, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $3,108 · Current $3,108
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(i):Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with at least one handrail: Site - Employees were not protected from fall hazards while using the interior stairway between the first and second story which was not equipped with a handrail.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3108
More inspections at Dave Senecal
View Dave Senecal's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 345862536.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.