BERLIN, CT —
OSHA Inspection: EVERSOURCE ENERGY SERVICE COMPANY
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of EVERSOURCE ENERGY SERVICE COMPANY in 107 SELDEN STREET, BERLIN, CT 06037 (NAICS 221122). OSHA activity number 346017320.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- EVERSOURCE ENERGY SERVICE COMPANY
- Site address
- 107 SELDEN STREET
- City
- BERLIN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06037
- Mailing
- 107 SELDEN STREET, BERLIN, CT 06037
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 221122
- Employees
- 1304
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 D02
- Issued
- Sep 12, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 28, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $8,806 · Current $6,526 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(d)(2): The employer did not ensure that the minimum perpendicular distance from the centerline of the steps or rungs, or grab bars, or both, to the nearest permanent object in back of the ladder is 7 inches (18 cm): In the following locations, sufficient clearance was not provided behind fixed ladders: A. Community Building, Near Cooling Tower: On, or about, June 16, 2022, the clearance from the centerline of the rungs on the fixed ladder was measured to be six inches from the building surface. B. Fleet Building: On, or about, July 13, 2022, the clearance from the 22nd rung (ascending) was measured to be four inches from the roof edge.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $6525.73
- — C (S) $8806
- — Z (S) $8806
1910.23 D04
- Issued
- Sep 12, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 28, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(d)(4): The employer did not ensure that the side rails of through or sidestep ladders extend at least 42 inches (1.1 m) above the top of the access level or landing platform served by the ladder: On, or about, June 16, 2022, in the following locations, the side rail height provided above the roof line for fixed ladders was less than 42 inches above the roof line: A. Community Building, Near Cooling Tower. B. Main Building, Tower Roof Access, Ladder for East Wing Roof.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.29 B01
- Issued
- Sep 12, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 28, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $8,806 · Current $6,526 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.29(b)(1): The employer did not ensure that guardrail systems met the requirement that the top edge height of top rails, or equivalent guardrail system members, that are 42 inches (107 cm), plus or minus 3 inches (8 cm), above the walking-working surface: Main Tower, Exterior Roof Access Stairs: On, or about, June 16, 2022, the upper landing platform for the fixed stairs was equipped with a railing that was installed lower than 42 inches, nominal.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $6525.73
- — C (S) $8806
- — Z (S) $8806
1910.29 B02 I
- Issued
- Sep 12, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 28, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.29(b)(2)(i): The employer did not ensure that guardrails met the requirement that midrails that are installed at a height midway between the top edge of the guardrail system and the walking-working surface: A. Main Tower, Roof Access Stairs: On, or about, June 16, 2022, the upper stair landing provided for the fixed stairs was not provided with a midrail or equivalent member. B. Main Tower, Roof Access Landing: On, or about, June 16, 2022, the midrail provided in the guard rail system installed at the roof landing for the access stairs was installed higher than "midway" between the top rail and roof level, which left a larger opening between the midrail and roof surface. Abatement Note: The roof access stairs and landing should be reconfigured to not require employees to navigate down a set of steep stairs onto a membrane roof in close proximity to the roof edge. As an interim measure, in addition to lowering the midrail, a toeboard or other solid member should be added to the existing guardrail to fill the gap(s) between railings to offer a more positive stop in the event that an employee slips at the lower stair landing.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.303 G01 I A
- Issued
- Sep 12, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 28, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $7,044 · Current $6,526 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(i)(A): For electric equipment operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground, and likely to require examination, adjustment, servicing, or maintenance while energized, the depth of the working space in the direction of access to live parts (as measured from the live parts where they were exposed or from the enclosure front or opening where they were enclosed) was less than indicated in Table S-1 of Subpart S of Part 1910: Main Building, Main Tower, HVAC/Switchgear Room: On, or about, June 16, 2022, the following 480 volt electrical enclosures were not provided with adequate working space: A. Duct Heater control panel labeled as E-S. B. Duct Heater control panel labeled as E-W. C. Duct Heater control panel labeled as E-N. D. Panel PPHT. E. Duct Heater control panel labeled as E-E F. Motor Control Center.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $6525.73
- — C (S) $7044
- — Z (S) $7044
1910.305 B01 II
- Issued
- Sep 12, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 28, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii): Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed: Main Building, Main Tower, HVAC/Switchgear Room: On, or about, June 16, 2022, the following 480 volt electrical enclosures had openings in the front cover to allow visual inspection of internal indicator lights: A. Duct Heater control panel labeled as E-S. B. Duct Heater control panel labeled as E-W. C. Duct Heater control panel labeled as E-N. D. Duct Heater control panel labeled as E-E
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.332 B01
- Issued
- Sep 12, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 28, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $8,806 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.332(b)(1): Employees were not trained in and familiar with the safety-related work practices required by 1910.331 through 1910.335 that pertained to their respective job assignments: Facility Maintenance: On, or about, June 16, 2022, maintenance personnel had not been trained regarding what work practices and protective equipment was required to protect them against electric shock, arc flash and arc blast hazards while performing live electrical work, live trouble-shooting and verifying whether or not electrical equipment was properly de-energized. One employee had not received training and the online training provided was broad based and did not provide specific guidance to employees regarding what specific types of personal protective equipment needed to be worn while working on or around different voltage classes.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $8806
- — Z (S) $8806
1910.335 A01 I
- Issued
- Sep 12, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 28, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $500
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not using electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body to be protected and for the work to be performed: Facility Maintenance: On, or about, June 16, 2022, personal protective equipment such as, but not limited to, face shields, a fire resistive balaclava and head protection were not required to be worn by employees who performed live electrical work, including trouble-shooting, or who verified that electrical equipment was properly de-energized. Section 6.6 of the Safety and Health program did not require the use of an arc rated face shield and balaclava for maintenance and preventative maintenance work that was performed by mechanics on equipment up to and including 480 volt circuits and equipment.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $500.01
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Eversource Energy Service Company
View Eversource Energy Service Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 221122)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346017320.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.