Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: THS NATIONAL LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of THS NATIONAL LLC in 4000 AND 2000 ELLINGTON METRO WEST, WESTBOROUGH, MA 01580 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 346025869.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch THS National LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for THS National LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
THS NATIONAL LLC
Site address
4000 AND 2000 ELLINGTON METRO WEST
City
WESTBOROUGH
State
MA
ZIP
01580
Mailing
1050 CLASSIC ROAD, APEX, NC 27539
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236118
Employees
14
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1200 G07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2022
Abate by
Aug 23, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,646 · Current $1,823 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.1200(g)(7)(i): Distributors did not ensure that material safety data sheets and updated information were provided to other distributors and employers  with their initial shipment, and with the first shipment after a material safety data sheet was updated: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)  2000 and 4000 Ellington Metro West., Westborough, MA: On or about June 15, 2022, the controlling employer  did not ensure that his sub contractor was provided with the safety data sheet for the James Hardie brand  board siding that was provided for installation at this residential construction site.  Specific abatement documentation that this violation has been corrected must be provided within 10 days of the abatement in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1823
  • — Z (S) $3646

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2022
Abate by
Aug 23, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,646 · Current $1,823 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1):The controlling employer did not  ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles:  2000 and 4000 Ellington Metro West., Westborough, MA: On or about June 15, 2022, the controlling employer did not ensure that his sub contractor's employees were provided with eye protection while they were installing  the James Hardie brand board siding at this residential site.  Specific abatement documentation that this violation has been corrected must be provided within 10 days of the abatement in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1823
  • — Z (S) $3646

1926.403 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2022
Abate by
Sep 7, 2022
Penalty
Initial $6,381 · Current $3,191 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.403(b)(2): Listed, labeled, or certified equipment was not  installed and used in accordance with instructions included in the listing, labeling, or certification:  a)  2000 Ellington Metro West., Westborough, MA: On or about June 15, 2022,  employees were noted to be using multiple extension cord sets that were connected together to increase the reach of the cords ( aka daisy chaining) which is not permitted by the cord manufacturer and the controlling employer did not ensure that his sub contractor was using extension cords  in accordance with the instructions included in the listing, labeling, or certification.   b) 4000 Ellington Metro West., Westborough, MA: On or about June 15, 2022, employees were noted to be using a ground fault circuit interrupter (GFCI) that was connected (plugged) into extension cord sets instead of an outlet receptacle and the controlling employer did not ensure that his sub contractor was using the GFCI in accordance with the listing, labeling or certification.  Specific abatement documentation that this violation has been corrected must be provided within 10 days of the abatement in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3190.5
  • — Z (S) $6381

1926.403 I02 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2022
Abate by
Aug 23, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.403(i)(2)(i): Live parts of electric equipment operating at 50 volts or more  were not guarded against accidental contact by cabinets or other forms of enclosures, nor by any of the  means listed in subparagraph (A) through (D) of this paragraph:   2000  Ellington Metro West., Westborough, MA: On or about June 15, 2022, the employees working at this site were using  an extension cord with the female attachment plug removed and the ends bare  conductors were alligator clipped onto live 120 volt AC conductors that were pulled out of an exterior  wall mounted junction box .  Specific abatement documentation that this violation has been corrected must be provided within 10 days of the abatement in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.404 F06

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2022
Abate by
Aug 23, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.404(f)(6): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures was not  permanent and/or continuous:   2000  Ellington Metro West., Westborough, MA: On or about June 15, 2022, the employees working at this site were using a flexible extension cord that was spliced directly into the 120 volt AC conductors of a premise wiring junction box and the path to ground from the premise wiring circuit to the extension cord was not continuous.   Specific abatement documentation that this violation has been corrected must be provided within 10 days of the abatement in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.405 G02 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2022
Abate by
Aug 23, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.405(g)(2)(iii): . Flexible cords were not  used  in continuous lengths without splice or tap:   2000  Ellington Metro West., Westborough, MA: On or about June 15, 2022, the employees working at this site were using a flexible cord that was not used in continuous lengths without splice or tap in that one of the cords attachment plugs had been removed and the cords conductors were tapped into the 120 Volt AC premise wiring with alligator clips and wire nuts.   Specific abatement documentation that this violation has been corrected must be provided within 10 days of the abatement in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.405 G02 IV

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2022
Abate by
Aug 23, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.405(g)(2)(iv):  Flexible cords were not  connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided which will prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws:   2000  Ellington Metro West., Westborough, MA: On or about June 15, 2022, the employees working at this site were using a flexible  cords that was spliced  directly into the live 120 volt AC conductors of an exterior junction box and they were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws  Specific abatement documentation that this violation has been corrected must be provided within 10 days of the abatement in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2022
Abate by
Aug 23, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,646 · Current $1,823 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(5)(i):Non-self-supporting ladders were used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was  greater than approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support):  the controlling employer did not ensure that his sub contractor's employee(s) using aluminum extension ladders  to access upper levels while  installing siding,  installed the ladders so that the working angle did not exceed a ratio of 4:1 or one quarter the working length of the ladder. The ladder was set up at an angle of nearly 2: 1 exposing employees to ladder displacement and fall from height hazards.  Specific abatement documentation that this violation has been corrected must be provided within 10 days of the abatement in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1823
  • — Z (S) $3646

1904.40 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2022
Abate by
Aug 23, 2022
Penalty
Initial $912 · Current $456 Reduced
29 CFR  1904.40(a): The employer did not provide an authorized government representative the records within the four business hours.   2000 and 4000 Ellington Metro West, Westborough, MA: On or about June 15, 2022, the employer did not provide the requested OSHA 300A logs within 4 business hours of the request.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $456
  • — Z (O) $912

View THS National LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346025869.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.