PATERSON, NJ —
OSHA Inspection: MJT ROOFING
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MJT ROOFING in 85 5TH AVE, PATERSON, NJ 07524 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346040454.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MJT ROOFING
- Site address
- 85 5TH AVE
- City
- PATERSON
- State
- NJ
- ZIP
- 07524
- Mailing
- 272 LANZA AVE, GARFIELD, NJ 07026
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Aug 22, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $2,611 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v):A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift: Note: As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system. The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated A. 85 5th Ave, Paterson, NJ: An employee working from a Genie Aerial Lift was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 15 feet without utilization of personal fall arrest system such as but not limited to harnesses and lanyard in place, on or about 6/24/2022.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2610.6
- — Z (S) $4351
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- Aug 22, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $2,611 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system. A. 85 5th Ave, Paterson, NJ: An employee working on a roof was exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 20 feet without utilization of fall protection system such as but not limited to personal fall arrest system, warning lines guardrail system and warning line system, on or about 6/24/2022.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2610.6
- — Z (S) $4351
More inspections at MJT Roofing
View MJT Roofing's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NJ
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346040454.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.