Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SEABERG CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SEABERG CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 712 GREENVILLE AVE., JOHNSTON, RI 02919 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 346049216.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Seaberg Construction, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Seaberg Construction, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
712 GREENVILLE AVE.
City
JOHNSTON
State
RI
ZIP
02919
Mailing
75 RAILROAD AVE., JOHNSTON, RI 02919
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238990
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2022
Abate by
Oct 27, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,351 · Current $2,176 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   a) Worksite: On or about June 29, 2022, the employer did not ensure that employees engaged in residential roofing activities, at heights greater than 18 feet, were protected from the fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2175.5
  • — Z (S) $4351

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2022
Abate by
Oct 27, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,351 · Current $2,176 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1):Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  a) Worksite: On or about June 29, 2022, the employer allowed employees to access the roof from two ladders that did not extend three feet past the upper landing surface, in the following locations:  1) The extension ladder on the left side of the house did not extend at least 3 feet past the upper landing surface.  2) The extension ladder at the rear of the house did not extend at least 3 feet past the upper landing surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2175.5
  • — Z (S) $4351

1926.1053 B10

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2022
Abate by
Oct 27, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(10):The tops of a non-self-supporting ladder with more than one support attachment were not placed with the two rails supported equally:  a) Worksite: On or about June 29, 2022, employees were exposed to fall hazards from ascending and descending an extension ladder that was leaning against the downward slope of a roof edge, preventing equal support to both ladder rails.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Oct 11, 2022
Abate by
Oct 27, 2022
Penalty
Initial $349 · Current $175 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.503(b)(1):The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer:  a) Worksite: On or about June 29, 2022, the employer did not ensure that any fall protection instructions provided to employees complied with paragraph (a), nor did the employer prepare a written training certificate to show that the training was completed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $174.5
  • — Z (O) $349

View Seaberg Construction, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346049216.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.