Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: PORT JERVIS LABORATORIES, INC.

Federal Agency inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency health inspection of PORT JERVIS LABORATORIES, INC. in 20 WEST KING ST., PORT JERVIS, NY 12771 (NAICS 325620). OSHA activity number 346051162.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Port Jervis Laboratories, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Port Jervis Laboratories, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
20 WEST KING ST.
City
PORT JERVIS
State
NY
ZIP
12771
Mailing
20 WEST KING ST., PORT JERVIS, NY 12771
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325620
Employees
480
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.133 A01

Other-than-serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2022
Abate by
Dec 23, 2022
Penalty
Initial $10,360 · Current $7,770 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:    (a) On or about 6/20/2022, at facility, for the compounders weighing and milling batches of powders containing chemicals such as, but not limited to, iron oxide, talc, mica, calcium silicate, and carmine (sensitizer).  The employer did not enforce the requirement to use eye protection.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $7770
  • — C (S) $10360
  • — Z (S) $10360

1910.134 E03 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2022
Abate by
Jan 6, 2023
Penalty
Initial $14,502 · Current $10,877 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(3)(i): The employer did not provide a follow-up medical examination for employees who gave a positive response to any question among questions 1 through 8 in Section 2, Part A of Appendix C, or whose initial medical evaluation demonstrated a need for a follow-up medical examination:   (a) On or about 6/20/2022, at facility, for the compounders weighing and milling batches of powders containing chemicals such as, but not limited to, iron oxide, talc, mica, calcium silicate, and carmine (sensitizer) and required to wear 3M 8210 N95 filtering face piece respirators and half face elastomeric respirator with P100 cartridges.  The employer did not provide follow-up medical examinations to the four employees who gave positive responses to any question 1 through 8 in Section 2, Part A of Appendix C (OSHA Respirator Medical Evaluation Questionnaire).
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $10876.5
  • — C (S) $14502
  • — Z (S) $14502

1910.134 E07 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2022
Abate by
Jan 6, 2023
Penalty
Initial $145,027 · Current $108,770 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(7)(i): The employer did not provide additional medical evaluations that complied with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.134 when an employee reported medical signs or symptoms that were related to ability to use a respirator:  (a) On or about 6/20/2022, at facility, a compounder weighing and milling batches of powders containing chemicals such as, but not limited to, iron oxide, talc, mica, calcium silicate, and carmine (sensitizer) and required to wear 3M 8210 N95 filtering face piece respirator and half face elastomeric respirator with P100 cartridges reported medical signs and symptoms to the employer including shortness of breath and asthma. He died later that day. The employee was previously hospitalized after reporting shortness of breath and asthma to the employer in May 2021.  The employer did not provide additional medical evaluation after the employee reported medical signs or symptoms that affected his ability to use a respirator.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $108770.25
  • — C (W) $145027
  • — Z (W) $145027

1910.134 E04 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2022
Abate by
Jan 6, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(4)(i): The medical questionnaire and examinations were not administered confidentially during the employee's normal working hours or at a time and place convenient to the employee:    (a) On or about 6/20/2022, at facility, for the compounders weighing and milling batches of powders containing chemicals such as, but not limited to, iron oxide, talc, mica, calcium silicate, and carmine (sensitizer) and required to wear 3M 8210 N95 filtering face piece respirators and half face elastomeric respirator with P100 cartridges.  The employer did not ensure that completed medical questionnaires were kept in a manner that only authorized medical personnel could access. Documents were kept in an unlocked drawer, not in secure sealed envelopes to maintain confidentiality.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 M01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 19, 2022
Abate by
Jan 23, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(m)(1): Records of medical evaluations required by 29 CFR 1910.134 were not retained and made available in accordance with 1910.1020:  a) On or about 6/20/2022, at facility, for the compounder weighing and milling batches of powders containing chemicals such as, but not limited to, iron oxide, talc, mica, calcium silicate, and carmine (sensitizer) and required to wear 3M 8210 N95 filtering face piece respirators and half face elastomeric respirator with P100 cartridges.  The records of the medical evaluations conducted and required to ensure employees are capable of wearing such respirators were not kept by the employer.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Port Jervis Laboratories, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346051162.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.