Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CUSTOM POLY BAG, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CUSTOM POLY BAG, INC. in 9465 EDISON ST NE`, ALLIANCE, OH 44601 (NAICS 326111). OSHA activity number 346058746.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Custom Poly BAG, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Custom Poly BAG, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
9465 EDISON ST NE`
City
ALLIANCE
State
OH
ZIP
44601
Mailing
9465 EDISON ST NE, ALLIANCE, OH 44601
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326111
Employees
63
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 63 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2022
Abate by
Nov 18, 2022
Penalty
Initial $14,502 · Current $14,502
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(1):The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:  On or about August 28, 2022, the employer had not established a program consisting of energy control procedures, employee training and inspections to ensure the startup or release of stored energy could not occur while performing servicing and maintenance activities. The employer engages in service and maintenance activities on machinery and equipment including, but not limited to mechanical power presses and automatic wickeder machines.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $14502
  • — Z (S) $14502

1910.212 A01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2022
Abate by
Oct 26, 2022
Penalty
Initial $14,502 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.212(a)(1):One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  (a)	On or about July 05, 2022, the employer failed to ensure that effective guarding was in place to protect employees from struck by and caught between hazards from the rotating metal arm and the two-pronged conveyor on the Automatic wickeder machine #9.  (b)	On or about July 05, 2022, the employer failed to ensure that effective guarding was in place to protect employees from struck by and caught between hazards from the rotating metal arm and the two-pronged conveyor on the Automatic wickeder machine #10.  (c)	On or about July 05, 2022, the employer failed to ensure that effective guarding was in place to protect employees from struck by and caught between hazards from the rotating moving metal arm and the two-pronged conveyor on the Automatic wickeder machine #11.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $14502

1910.219 C02 I

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2022
Abate by
Nov 18, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $7,251
29 CFR  1910.219(c)(2)(i):All exposed part(s) of horizontal shafting seven (7) feet or less from floor or working platform were not protected by stationary casing(s) enclosing shafting completely or by trough(s) enclosing sides and top or sides and bottom of shafting:  (a)	On or about July 05, 2022, during plastic bag packaging production, the employer failed to ensure that effective guarding was in place to protect employees from being caught in the rotating cam shaft of the transmission equipment on the Automatic wickeder machine #9.   (b)	On or about July 05, 2022, during plastic bag packaging production, the employer failed to ensure that effective guarding was in place to protect employees from being caught in the rotating cam shaft of the transmission equipment on the Automatic wickeder machine #10.   (c)	On or about July 05, 2022, during plastic bag packaging production, the employer failed to ensure that effective guarding was in place to protect employees from being caught in the rotating cam shaft of the transmission equipment on the Automatic wickeder machine #11.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7251
  • — Z (S) $0

View Custom Poly BAG, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346058746.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.