Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JOSE MORENO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOSE MORENO in 7733 97TH ST, LUBBOCK, TX 79424 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 346267438.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Jose Moreno — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jose Moreno is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JOSE MORENO
Site address
7733 97TH ST
City
LUBBOCK
State
TX
ZIP
79424
Mailing
7326 AMHERST ST, LUBBOCK, TX 79416
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 21, 2023
Abate by
May 19, 2023
Penalty
Initial $413 · Current $413
29 CFR  1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:   On or about April 17, 2023, the employer failed to submit certification of corrective action for citations issued on February 24, 2023, with an abatement due date of March 24, 2023.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $413

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 24, 2023
Penalty
Initial $1,878 · Current $1,878
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, were not protected by protective helmets:    At the construction site, employees exposed to overhead hazards were not wearing hardhats.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1878

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 24, 2023
Abate by
Mar 24, 2023
Penalty
Initial $2,210 · Current $2,210
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1):Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical agents:  Employees were exposed to struck by hazards not wearing eye protection while using  pneumatic nail guns.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2210

1926.304 D

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 24, 2023
Abate by
Mar 24, 2023
Penalty
Initial $2,210 · Current $2,210
29 CFR  1926.304(d): Portable, power-driven circular saw(s) were not equipped with a guard above and below the base plate or shoe:  Employees operating the Makita hand saw were exposed to point of operation hazards due to not being equipped with a guard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2210

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 24, 2023
Penalty
Initial $1,878 · Current $1,878
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a)    Employees framing a residential house were exposed to fall hazards due to not being provided fall protection while working above 6 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1878

1926.503 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 24, 2023
Abate by
Mar 24, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  Employees framing a residential house were exposed to fall hazards due to not being provided training on fall protection while working above 6 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View Jose Moreno's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346267438.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.