WALLINGFORD, CT —
OSHA Inspection: DELTA ARSENAL, LLC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of DELTA ARSENAL, LLC in 342 QUINNIPIAC STREET, WALLINGFORD, CT 06492 (NAICS 713990). OSHA activity number 346284250.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DELTA ARSENAL, LLC
- Site address
- 342 QUINNIPIAC STREET
- City
- WALLINGFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06492
- Mailing
- 342 QUINNIPIAC STREET, WALLINGFORD, CT 06492
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 713990
- Employees
- 19
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
12 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 G01 I A
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 2, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $6,250 · Current $0 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A):Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function: 342 Quinnipiac Street, Wallingford CT: On or about January 25, 2023, the employer did not ensure the two employees who were exposed to airborne lead while performing range cleaning activities wore tight-fitting respirators that had no facial hair interfering with the sealing surface.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $6250
- — Z (S) $6250
1910.1025 C01
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 2, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $6,250 · Current $1,500 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(c)(1):Employee(s) were exposed to lead at concentrations greater than fifty micrograms per cubic meter of air averaged over an eight-hour period: 342 QUINNIPIAC STREET, WALLINGFORD, CT 06492: On or about January 25, 2023, two employees who were responsible for cleaning the shooting ranges were exposed to eight-hour time-weighted-average concentrations of lead in excess of the OSHA permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 0.05 milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m3). One employee was exposed to 0.11 mg/m3 which is twice the PEL; the other was exposed to 0.15 mg/m3 which is three ties the PEL.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $1500
- — C (S) $6250
- — Z (S) $6250
1910.1025 D01 II
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 2, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $6,250 · Current $1,500 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(d)(1)(ii): Full shift (for at least seven -7 continuous hours) personal samples for lead were not collected including at least one sample for each shift for each job classification in each work area: 342 Quinnipiac Street, Wallingford CT: On or about October 17, 2022, the employer did not perform full shift sampling for the workers who were exposed to lead while performing range cleaning.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $1500
- — C (S) $6250
- — Z (S) $6250
1910.1025 E03 I
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 2, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $6,250 · Current $0 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(e)(3)(i): The employer did not establish and implement a written compliance program to reduce exposures to or below the permissible exposure limit, solely by means of engineering and work practice controls: 342 Quinnipiac Street, Wallingford CT: On or about October 17, 2022, the company had not established and implemented a written lead compliance program describing each operation resulting in lea emissions; methods, including engineering controls, used to achieve compliance with 29 CFR 1910.1025; a report of technology considered; air monitoring data documenting the source of the emissions; a work practice program outlining the required protective work clothing and equipment, housekeeping, and hygiene facilities and practices; and an administrative control schedule.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $6250
- — Z (S) $6250
1910.1025 M01 III
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 2, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $2,678 · Current $0 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(m)(1)(iii): The employer did not include lead in the hazard communication program established to comply with the hazard communication standard (1910.1200). 342 Quinnipiac Street, Wallingford CT: On or about October 17, 2022, the employer did not include lead in the written hazard communication program used at the workplace for employees exposed to lead above the permissible exposure limit during tasks such as (but not limited to) shooting range cleaning.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $2678
- — Z (S) $2678
1910.1200 E01 I
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 2, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i):The employer did not compile a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using a product identifier that was referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet. COMPANY-WIDE: On or about October 17, 2022, the employer did not include a list of the hazardous chemicals used at the facility in their written Hazard Communication Program. Hazardous chemicals in use included, but were not limited to lead.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 2, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $12,500 · Current $3,000 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1):A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: COMPANY-WIDE: On or about October 17, 2022, the employer, having employees who were exposed to lead at or above the permissible exposure limit, had not developed and implemented a written respiratory protection program. Delta Arsenal, LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1433026, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on August 9, 2021, with respect to a workplace located at 342 Quinnipiac Street, Wallingford, CT 06492.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $3000
- — C (R) $12500
- — Z (R) $12500
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 2, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: 342 Quinnipiac Street, Wallingford CT: On or about January 25, 2023, employees were not provided with a medical evaluation prior to being required to wear a respirator while cleaning the shooting ranges. The employees were exposed to lead while performing this task. Delta Arsenal, LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1433026, citation number 2, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on August 9, 2021, with respect to a workplace located at 342 Quinnipiac Street, Wallingford, CT 06492.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (R) $0
- — Z (R) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 2, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator were not annually fit tested: 342 Quinnipiac Street, Wallingford CT: On or about January 25, 2023, the employer did not ensure that employees required to wear tight-fitting, full-face respirators had passed an annual fit test before wearing the respirators and being exposed to airborne lead concentrations above the permissible exposure limit during tasks such as, but not limited to, shooting range cleaning. Delta Arsenal, LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1433026, citation number 2, item number 2 and was affirmed as a final order on August 9, 2021, with respect to a workplace located at 342 Quinnipiac Street, Wallingford, CT 06492.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (R) $0
- — Z (R) $0
1910.1025 H01
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 2, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $12,500 · Current $3,000 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(1): All surfaces were not maintained as free as practicable of accumulations of lead: 342 Quinnipiac Street, Wallingford CT: On or about October 17, 2022 , the employer did not ensure through appropriate housekeeping that surfaces in break areas where food was prepared were kept as free as practicable from accumulations of lead. Delta Arsenal LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard, 29 CFR 1910.1025(h)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1433026, citation number 2, item number 3, and was affirmed as a final order on 08/09/2021, with respect to a workplace located at 342 Quinnipiac Street, Wallingford CT 06492.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $3000
- — C (R) $12500
- — Z (R) $12500
1904.7 B04
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 2, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $893 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.7(b)(4):The employer did not correctly classify the following work-related injuries or illnesses on the OSHA Form 300 or equivalent. 342 QUINNIPIAC STREET, WALLINGFORD, CT 06492: On or about April 10, 2023, the employer did not correctly enter the following work-related injuries or illnesses on the OSHA Form 300 or equivalent for the calendar year 2022: a) In November 2022, a Range Safety Officer was determined to have a high blood lead level which resulted in restricted duty. The illness would be appropriately captured by entering the date of the blood test in Column D and a check in Column M4 indicating poisoning. Abatement Certification and Documentation is required
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $893
- — Z (O) $893
1910.1025 N02 II
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2023
- Abate by
- Jun 2, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $501 · Current $0 Reduced
1591
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1025(n)(2)(ii): The record of medical surveillance for lead exposure did not include the items required by 29 CFR 1910.1025(n)(2)(ii)(A) through (n)(2)(ii)(D): 342 Quinnipiac Street, Wallingford CT: On or about January 25, 2023, the employer did not maintain medical surveillance records as required from paragraphs A-D including a description of the workers duties and a copy of the physician's medical opinion for the worker with elevated blood lead levels exposed to airborne lead concentrations above the permissible exposure limit.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $501
- — Z (O) $501
More inspections at Delta Arsenal, LLC
View Delta Arsenal, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 713990)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346284250.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.