NEWTOWN, CT —
OSHA Inspection: HENRY ROOFING, LLC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of HENRY ROOFING, LLC. in 4 HITFIELD ROAD, NEWTOWN, CT 06470 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346284714.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HENRY ROOFING, LLC.
- Site address
- 4 HITFIELD ROAD
- City
- NEWTOWN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06470
- Mailing
- 11 CORN TASSEL ROAD, DANBURY, CT 06811
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.502 D15
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,108 · Current $3,108
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage used for attachment for personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached nor was it designed, installed and used as follows: As part of a complete personal fall arrest system which maintains a safety factor of at least two; and under the supervision of a qualified person: Worksite: The employer did not ensure that all components of the fall arrest systems could support at least 5,000 pounds per employee attached.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $3108
- — C (S) $3108
- — Z (S) $3108
1926.503 A02 II
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,108 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2)(ii): The employer did not assure that each employee, as necessary, had been trained by a competent person in the correct procedures for erecting, maintaining, disassembling and inspecting the fall protection systems to be used. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were required to work on the roof at a height above six feet were trained in the correct procedures for erecting, maintaining, disassembling, and inspecting the fall protection systems to be used.
Recent events (3)
- — F (W) $500
- — C (S) $3108
- — Z (S) $3108
1926.1060 A01
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2022
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders as necessary, enabling each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards: Worksite: The employer did not ensure that employees who were required to use the extension ladder to gain access to the roof were trained by a competent person in the proper procedures to minimize the hazards associated with ladders.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2022
- Abate by
- Jan 3, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,351 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the extension ladder that was used to gain access to the roof at a height of 17 feet 10 inches above the ground had its side rails extended 3 feet above the landing surface. On or about October 10, 2022, an employee sustained multiple injuries after falling from an extension ladder.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $4351
- — Z (S) $4351
1926.1053 B15
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2022
- Abate by
- Jan 3, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $1,865 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(15): Ladders were not inspected by a competent person for visible defects on a periodic basis and after an occurrence that could affect their safe use: Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the extension ladder that was used to gain access to the roof was safe for use.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $1865
- — Z (S) $1865
More inspections at Henry Roofing, LLC.
View Henry Roofing, LLC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346284714.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.