Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: EDWARD J SANCHEZ DBA SANCHEZ CONSTRUCTION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EDWARD J SANCHEZ DBA SANCHEZ CONSTRUCTION in 5545 N. ROSEMARY DR., APPLETON, WI 54913 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346296502.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Edward J Sanchez DBA Sanchez Construction — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Edward J Sanchez DBA Sanchez Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5545 N. ROSEMARY DR.
City
APPLETON
State
WI
ZIP
54913
Mailing
1302 E. PORTS O CALL DR. APT# 2S, PALATINE, IL 60074
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
11
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Jan 24, 2023
Abate by
Feb 22, 2023
Penalty
Initial $501 · Current $501
29 CFR  1903.19(c)(1):Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section.  The employer failed to provide abatement certification for the citation issued on November 10, 2022.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $501

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2022
Abate by
Dec 12, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,315 · Current $1,989 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets.  On or about October 21, 2022, at location 5545 N. Rosemary Dr., Appleton, Wisconsin: one employee was exposed to struck by hazards from falling tools and construction debris while removing old shingles thrown from the roof and a hard hat was not worn.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1989
  • — Z (S) $3315

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2022
Abate by
Dec 12, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1): The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  On or about October 21, 2022, at location 5545 N. Rosemary Dr., Appleton, Wisconsin: employees performing residential roofing activities were observed using pneumatic nails guns to attach asphalt shingles and were not wearing eye protection while exposed to potential flying particles.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2022
Penalty
Initial $4,144 · Current $2,486 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.  On or about October 21, 2022, at location 5545 N. Rosemary Dr., Appleton, Wisconsin: employees were performing residential roofing activities without any form of conventional fall protection while exposed to fall hazards of approximately 10 feet to 23 feet.  Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2486.4
  • — Z (S) $4144

1926.502 D15

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.502(d)(15):Anchorages used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment shall be independent of any anchorage being used to support or suspend platforms and capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached, or shall be designed, installed, and used as follows:  On or about October 21, 2022, at location 5545 N. Rosemary Dr., Appleton, Wisconsin: one employee was performing residential roofing activities while being tied into one anchor point that was not properly secured to the roof.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 D17

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.502(d)(17):The attachment point of the body belt shall be located in the center of the wearer's back. The attachment point of the body harness shall be located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head.  On or about October 21, 2022, at location 5545 N. Rosemary Dr., Appleton, Wisconsin: one employee was performing residential roofing activities with a fall hazard of approximately 10 feet  and did not attach their fall arrest components to a point near the center of their back.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2022
Abate by
Dec 12, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1):The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards.  On or about October 21, 2022, at location 5545 N. Rosemary Dr., Appleton, Wisconsin: the employer did not develop and implement a fall protection training program to enable employees exposed to fall hazards during construction activities to recognize the hazards of falling and procedures to be followed in order to minimize those hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 10, 2022
Penalty
Initial $3,315 · Current $1,989 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1):When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.  On or about October 21, 2022, at location 5545 N. Rosemary Dr., Appleton, Wisconsin: employees were utilizing four metal extension ladders that did not extend three feet above the roof surface.  a) Ladder by door on the north side of garage used for access and egress did not extend three feet above the roof surface.  b)Ladder on the north side of front door used for access and egress did not extend three feet above the roof surface.  c)Ladder by the single garage door on the  east side used for access and egress did not extend three feet above the roof surface.  d)Ladder on the south side of garage used for access and egress did not extend three feet above the roof surface.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1989
  • — Z (S) $3315

View Edward J Sanchez DBA Sanchez Construction's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346296502.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.