APPLETON, WI —
OSHA Inspection: EDWARD J SANCHEZ DBA SANCHEZ CONSTRUCTION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EDWARD J SANCHEZ DBA SANCHEZ CONSTRUCTION in 5545 N. ROSEMARY DR., APPLETON, WI 54913 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346296502.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- EDWARD J SANCHEZ DBA SANCHEZ CONSTRUCTION
- Site address
- 5545 N. ROSEMARY DR.
- City
- APPLETON
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54913
- Mailing
- 1302 E. PORTS O CALL DR. APT# 2S, PALATINE, IL 60074
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 11
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Jan 24, 2023
- Abate by
- Feb 22, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $501 · Current $501
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1):Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section. The employer failed to provide abatement certification for the citation issued on November 10, 2022.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $501
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Nov 10, 2022
- Abate by
- Dec 12, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $3,315 · Current $1,989 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets. On or about October 21, 2022, at location 5545 N. Rosemary Dr., Appleton, Wisconsin: one employee was exposed to struck by hazards from falling tools and construction debris while removing old shingles thrown from the roof and a hard hat was not worn.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1989
- — Z (S) $3315
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Nov 10, 2022
- Abate by
- Dec 12, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer shall ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. On or about October 21, 2022, at location 5545 N. Rosemary Dr., Appleton, Wisconsin: employees performing residential roofing activities were observed using pneumatic nails guns to attach asphalt shingles and were not wearing eye protection while exposed to potential flying particles.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Nov 10, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $4,144 · Current $2,486 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):"Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. On or about October 21, 2022, at location 5545 N. Rosemary Dr., Appleton, Wisconsin: employees were performing residential roofing activities without any form of conventional fall protection while exposed to fall hazards of approximately 10 feet to 23 feet. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2486.4
- — Z (S) $4144
1926.502 D15
- Issued
- Nov 10, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15):Anchorages used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment shall be independent of any anchorage being used to support or suspend platforms and capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached, or shall be designed, installed, and used as follows: On or about October 21, 2022, at location 5545 N. Rosemary Dr., Appleton, Wisconsin: one employee was performing residential roofing activities while being tied into one anchor point that was not properly secured to the roof.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.502 D17
- Issued
- Nov 10, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17):The attachment point of the body belt shall be located in the center of the wearer's back. The attachment point of the body harness shall be located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head. On or about October 21, 2022, at location 5545 N. Rosemary Dr., Appleton, Wisconsin: one employee was performing residential roofing activities with a fall hazard of approximately 10 feet and did not attach their fall arrest components to a point near the center of their back.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Nov 10, 2022
- Abate by
- Dec 12, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. On or about October 21, 2022, at location 5545 N. Rosemary Dr., Appleton, Wisconsin: the employer did not develop and implement a fall protection training program to enable employees exposed to fall hazards during construction activities to recognize the hazards of falling and procedures to be followed in order to minimize those hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Nov 10, 2022
- Penalty
- Initial $3,315 · Current $1,989 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support. On or about October 21, 2022, at location 5545 N. Rosemary Dr., Appleton, Wisconsin: employees were utilizing four metal extension ladders that did not extend three feet above the roof surface. a) Ladder by door on the north side of garage used for access and egress did not extend three feet above the roof surface. b)Ladder on the north side of front door used for access and egress did not extend three feet above the roof surface. c)Ladder by the single garage door on the east side used for access and egress did not extend three feet above the roof surface. d)Ladder on the south side of garage used for access and egress did not extend three feet above the roof surface.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1989
- — Z (S) $3315
More inspections at Edward J Sanchez DBA Sanchez Construction
View Edward J Sanchez DBA Sanchez Construction's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346296502.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.