Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: DANIEL RAMIREZ

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of DANIEL RAMIREZ in 1245 HUNTERS RIDGE, CROWLEY, TX 76036 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 346375942.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Daniel Ramirez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Daniel Ramirez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
DANIEL RAMIREZ
Site address
1245 HUNTERS RIDGE
City
CROWLEY
State
TX
ZIP
76036
Mailing
3418 LITTLEJOHN AVE, FORT WORTH, TX 76105
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 A02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 6, 2022
Penalty
Initial $2,113 · Current $1,268 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(a)(2): A respirator was not provided by the employer to each employee when such equipment was necessary to protect the health of the employee:  At the residential construction jobsite, employees who were cutting masonry brick with a DB Diamondback 10" Heavy-Duty Tile Saw were not protected with personal protective equipment and exposed to respiratory hazards from the dust, silica dust and particles.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1267.8
  • — Z (S) $2113

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 6, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1):The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.   At the job site, an employee was not provided eye protection when operating a DB Diamondback 10" Heavy-Duty  Tile Saw dry cutting bricks and was exposed to eye injuries from flying objects.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.416 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 6, 2022
Penalty
Initial $1,585 · Current $951 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.416(e)(1):Worn or frayed electric cords or cables were used:  At the residential construction  jobsite, an employee was cutting masonry brick with a DB Diamondback 10" Heavy-Duty Tile Saw used a damaged electrical extension cord. The employee was potentially exposed to an electrical shock hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $951
  • — Z (S) $1585

1926.1153 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 6, 2022
Penalty
Initial $1,585 · Current $951 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.1153(c)(1):For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.  At the residential construction site, employees used a DB Diamondback 10" Heavy-Duty Tile Saw to dry cut bricks, were not protected from being exposed to crystalline silica with the use of engineering controls, work practices and respiratory protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $951
  • — Z (S) $1585

1926.1153 D02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 6, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1153(d)(2)(i):The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section:  At the residential construction site, employees used a DB Diamondback 10" Heavy-Duty Tile Saw to dry cut bricks. Employees were potentially exposed to crystalline silica hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 6, 2022
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1):  Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports:  At the residential construction jobsite, at least one worked from a tubular welded frame scaffold that was not fully planked. The employee was exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Daniel Ramirez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346375942.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.