Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JLP CONSTRUCTION LLC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of JLP CONSTRUCTION LLC in 146 E NIELDS ST, WEST CHESTER, PA 19382 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346423791.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch JLP Construction LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for JLP Construction LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
146 E NIELDS ST
City
WEST CHESTER
State
PA
ZIP
19382
Mailing
2 1/2 ALBANY AVE, NEW CASTLE, DE 19720
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2023
Abate by
Jul 24, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:  a) Jobsite at 146 E Nields Street, West Chester, PA - On or about January 9, 2023, the employer did not initiate or maintain an accident prevention program to address the hazards that employees are exposed to during roofing activities, such as but not limited to fall hazards and ladder safety.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4688

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2023
Abate by
Jul 24, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1):The employer did not train each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards to enable them to recognize fall hazards and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  a) Jobsite at 146 E Nields Street, West Chester, PA - On or about January 9, 2023, the employer did not provide a training program for each employee conducting residential framing activities in the recognition and avoidance of fall hazards. Employees were conducting roofing activities on a three story residential building in close proximity to unprotected sides and edges without the use of fall protection, thus exposing employees to falls ranging from approximately 20 to 30 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1060 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2023
Abate by
Jul 24, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.  a) Jobsite at 146 E Nields Street, West Chester, PA- On or about January 9, 2023, the employer did not ensure that employees were provided training on the recognition and mitigation of hazards associated with the use of ladders. Employees utilized a self-supporting ladder in a closed position, extension ladders did not extend three feet above an upper landing surface, and ladders were used at an angle greater than a 4:1 ratio during roofing operations, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2023
Abate by
Jul 24, 2023
Penalty
Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
29 CFR  1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  a) Jobsite at 146 E Nields Street, West Chester, PA - On or about January 9, 2023, the employer did not ensure that an employee working on the ground level below roofing operations was protected with a protective helmet, thereby exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3349

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2023
Abate by
Jul 24, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by a guardrail system, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, or an alternative fall protection measure that meets a provision described in paragraph (b) of this section.  a) Jobsite at 146 E Nields Street, West Chester, PA - On or about January 9, 2023, the employer did not ensure employees engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels were protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system. Employees were conducting roofing operations of a three story residential building without the use of fall protection, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards ranging approximately 20 to 30 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4688

1926.502 D21

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2023
Abate by
Jul 24, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.502(d)(21): Personal fall arrest systems were not inspected prior to each use for wear, damage, and other deterioration, and/or defective components were not removed from service:  a) Jobsite at 146 E Nields Street, West Chester, PA - On or about January 9, 2023, the employer did not ensure that personal fall arrest systems were inspected prior to each used and defective components were removed from service, thus exposing employees to fall hazards of approximately 20 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2023
Abate by
Jul 24, 2023
Penalty
Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to upper landing surfaces, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladders were used to gain access.  a) Jobsite at 146 E Nields Street, West Chester, PA - On or about January 9, 2023, the employer did not ensure the side rails of portable ladders used for access to an upper landing surface extended at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface being accessed. Employees utilized a portable ladder to access the roof of the second and third story without having side rails extended at least 3 feet above the landing surface, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards ranging  approximately 20 to 30 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3349

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2023
Abate by
Jul 24, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders were used for purposes other than the purposes for which they were designed:  a) Jobsite at 146 E Nields Street, West Chester, PA- On or about January 9, 2023, the employer did not ensure a portable self-supporting ladder was not used for purposes other than which it was designed.  An employee used a portable self-supporting ladder in the closed position to perform roofing work, thereby exposing the employee to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 27, 2023
Abate by
Jul 24, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladders were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder way approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder:    a) Jobsite at 146 E Nields Street, West Chester, PA- On or about January 9, 2023, the employer did not ensure an extension ladder was used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder way approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder, thereby exposing employees to fall hazards of approximately 6 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View JLP Construction LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346423791.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.