PAGO PAGO, AS —
OSHA Inspection: STARKIST SAMOA CO.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of STARKIST SAMOA CO. in 368 ATU'U ROAD, PAGO PAGO, AS 96799 (NAICS 311710). OSHA activity number 346443351.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- STARKIST SAMOA CO.
- Site address
- 368 ATU'U ROAD
- City
- PAGO PAGO
- State
- AS
- ZIP
- 96799
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 368 ATU'U, PAGO PAGO, AS 96799
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 311710
- Employees
- 2200
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1917.43 C05
- Issued
- May 30, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $6,696 · Current $6,696
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1917.43(c)(5): Powered industrial trucks were not maintained in safe working order. Forklift 052: The frame to the operator cab of the forklift used to move fish was dented, cracked, rusted and corroded exposing employees to struck-by and crushed-by hazards. Forklift 061: The frame to the operator cap of the forklift used to move fish was dented, cracked, rusted and corroded exposing employees to struck-by and crushed-by hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $6696
1917.151 B01
- Issued
- May 30, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $8,929 · Current $8,929
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1917.151(b)(1): 29 CFR 1917.151(b)(1): Danger zones on machines and equipment used by employees were not guarded. Second floor warehouse: The Krone Canmatic Labeler was operated with the guard wall removed. Employees were exposed to rotating parts and in-going nip point hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $8929
1910.305 B01 I
- Issued
- May 30, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $6,696 · Current $6,696
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(i): Conductors entering cutout boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not protected from abrasion, and openings through which conductors enter were not effectively closed. a. Krones Canmatic Labeler: Conductors entering below the glue tongue of the labelling machine were not being protected from abrasion. Employees were exposed to electrical hazards and fire hazards. b. Glue tongue, Krones Canmatic Labeler: The cover to the junction box on the left of the glue tongue was not properly secured in place causing the cover to move sideways exposing the inner electrical conductors. Employees were exposed to electrical hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $6696
1917.50 A
- Issued
- May 30, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $11,162 · Current $11,162
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1917.50(a): The employer used a material handling device listed in 29 CFR 1917.50(c) before ascertaining that the device had been certificated, as evidenced by current and valid documents attesting to compliance with the requirements in 29 CFR 1917.50(b). a. Crane # 9 Dock side of Pago Pago harbor: A dock side mobile carne that was not certificated, by an accredited inspector was used to unload fish from vessels exposing employees to struck-by hazards and crushed-by hazards b. Crane # 11 Dock side of Pago Pago harbor: A dock side mobile carne that was not certificated, by an accredited inspector was used to unload fish from vessels exposing employees to struck-by hazards and crushed-by hazards
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $11162
1917.50 C01
- Issued
- May 30, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $55,810 · Current $55,810
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1917.50(c)(1): Each crane and derrick was not tested as a unit quadrennially and examined annually. a. Crane #9: The crane used to unload fish was not tested quadrennially and was not examined annually. Employees were exposed to struck-by and crushed-by hazards. b. Crane #11: The crane used to unload fish was not tested quadrennially and was not examined annually. Employees were exposed to struck-by and crushed-by hazards. StarKist Samoa Co. was previously cited for a repeat violation of this Occupational Safety and Health Standard 29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1302826, citation number 1, item number 1 and was affirmed as a final order on July 05, 2018 with respect to the same workplace located at the Samoa Tuna Processor Warehouse, Pago Pago, American Samoa.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (R) $55810
More inspections at Starkist Samoa CO.
View Starkist Samoa CO.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 311710)
More inspections in AS
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346443351.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.