Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SEGUNDO MANAUAS

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SEGUNDO MANAUAS in 134 6TH STREET. APT 2, LOWELL, MA 01850 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 346451156.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Segundo Manauas — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Segundo Manauas is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
SEGUNDO MANAUAS
Site address
134 6TH STREET. APT 2
City
LOWELL
State
MA
ZIP
01850
Mailing
134 6TH ST APT 2, LOWELL, MA 01850
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
9
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2023
Abate by
Jul 26, 2023
Penalty
Initial $376 · Current $376
29 CFR  1903.19(d)(1): The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation No. 1 Item No(s). 1a, 1b, 1c, 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d, and 4 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent June 1, 2023.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $376

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 21, 2023
Abate by
Apr 27, 2023
Penalty
Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(1):It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part:  a. Jobsite- On or about January 11, 2023, the employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program to eliminate hazards at the jobsite.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3349

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Apr 21, 2023
Abate by
Apr 27, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.20(b)(2):The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s):  a.  Site - On or about January 11, 2023, the employer did not perform frequent and regular inspections by a competent person to identify hazards such as falls.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 A02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Apr 21, 2023
Abate by
Apr 27, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.503(a)(2):The employer did not assure that each employee exposed to fall hazards was trained by a competent person qualified in the areas specified in 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(2)(i) through (viii):   a. Site - On or about January 11, 2023, the employer's competent person did not train each employee in the nature of fall hazards in the work area; the correct procedures for erecting, maintaining, disassembling, and inspecting the fall protection systems to be used; and the installation, use and operation personal fall arrest systems, including anchorages.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 21, 2023
Penalty
Initial $3,349 · Current $3,349
29 CFR  1926.100(a):Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  a. Site - On or about January 11, 2023, employees were exposed to head injuries while working underneath the roofline where head protection was not provided or utilized to prevent the hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3349

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 21, 2023
Abate by
Apr 27, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   a. Site - On or about January 11, 2023, employees engaged in roofing activities were exposed to fall hazards of over 18 feet where fall protection was not provided or utilized to prevent the hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4688

1926.451 G01 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Apr 21, 2023
Abate by
Apr 27, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.451(g)(1)(iii): Each employee on a crawling board (chicken ladder) was not protected by a personal fall arrest system, a guardrail system (with minimum 200 pound toprail capacity), or by a three-fourth inch (1.9 cm) diameter grabline or equivalent handhold securely fastened beside each crawling board:  a. Site - On or about January 11, 2023, employees working from the chicken ladder were exposed to falls of over 18 feet, where fall protection was not provided or utilized to prevent the hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.452 M01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Apr 21, 2023
Abate by
Apr 27, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.452(m)(1):Crawling boards shall extend from the roof peak to the eaves when used in connection with roof construction, repair, or maintenance.  Jobsite - On or about January 11, 2023, an employee performing roofing work used a crawling board on the roof that did not extend from the roof peak to the eave. The approximately 8-foot section was located on the lower portion of the roof and did not extend to the roof peak.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.452 M02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 21, 2023
Abate by
Apr 27, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.452(m)(2):Crawling boards shall be secured to the roof by ridge hooks or by means that meet equivalent criteria (e.g., strength and durability).  Jobsite - On or about January 11, 2023, an employee used a crawling board on the roof that was not secured to the roof by ridge hooks or other adequate means. The approximately 8-foot section was secured at the base by the ladder used for access to the roof.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 21, 2023
Abate by
Apr 27, 2023
Penalty
Initial $4,688 · Current $4,688
29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1):Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:   a. Site - On or about October 11, 2023, the extension ladder utilized for roof access was not adequately installed in that the ladder did not extend 3 feet above the upper landing surface of the roof.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4688

View Segundo Manauas's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346451156.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.