Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SPRAY-TEK, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SPRAY-TEK, LLC in 3355 EAST COLLEY ROAD, BELOIT, WI 53511 (NAICS 541990). OSHA activity number 346512171.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Spray-Tek, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Spray-Tek, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
SPRAY-TEK, LLC
Site address
3355 EAST COLLEY ROAD
City
BELOIT
State
WI
ZIP
53511
Mailing
3355 EAST COLLEY ROAD, BELOIT, WI 53511
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
541990
Employees
58
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 3, 2023
Penalty
Initial $8,036 · Current $5,123 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:   On or about February 16, 2023, the employer failed to develop a written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134 for employees required to wear respirators, including employees working with recipes that require respiratory use and employees cleaning out caustic barrels.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5123
  • — Z (S) $8036

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 3, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:(a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATION/CONDITION) (DESCRIBE HAZARD) Note:  The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator.   On or about February 16, 2023, the employer failed to provide medical evaluation to determine employees' ability to use a respirator prior to employees being required to wear respirators, including employees working with recipes that require respiratory use and employees cleaning out caustic barrels.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 3, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):   On or about February 16, 2023, the employer failed to ensure employees required to wear respirators passed the appropriate fit test, including employees working with recipes that require respiratory use and employees cleaning out caustic barrels.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 3, 2023
Abate by
Jul 18, 2023
Penalty
Initial $10,046 · Current $7,534 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.146(c)(1):  The employer did not evaluate the workplace to determine if any spaces were permit-required confined spaces:  On or about February 3, 2023, the employer did not evaluate the workplace to determine if they were permit-required confined spaces, including the large stainless steel mixing tanks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7534
  • — Z (S) $10046

1910.146 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 3, 2023
Abate by
Jul 18, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.146(c)(2): The employer did not inform exposed employees, by posting danger signs or by any other equally effective means, of the existence and location of and the danger posed by the permit spaces.  On or about February 3, 2023, the employer did not inform exposed employees the existence, location and danger posted by permit-required confined spaces, including the large stainless steel mixing tanks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 C03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 3, 2023
Abate by
Jul 18, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.146(c)(3):  When the employer decided its employees would not enter permit spaces, the employer did not take effective measures to prevent its employees from entering the permit spaces:  On or about February 3, 2023, the employer did not take effective measures to prevent its employees from entering permit spaces, including the large stainless steel mixing tanks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 3, 2023
Abate by
Dec 1, 2023
Penalty
Initial $10,046 · Current $7,534 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(4): Procedures were not developed, documented, and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:  On or about February 3, 2023, procedures for the control of hazardous energy were not developed for the control of hazardous energy while cleaning and servicing the large stainless steel mixing tanks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7534
  • — Z (S) $10046

1910.147 C05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 3, 2023
Abate by
Jul 18, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(5)(i):  Locks, tags, chains, wedges, key blocks, adapter pins, self-locking fasteners, or other hardware were not provided by the employer for isolating, securing or blocking of machines or equipment from energy sources:  On or about February 3, 2023, employees were not provided locks, tags, chains, wedges, key blocks, adapter pins, self-locking fasteners, or other hardware to properly lock out equipment when cleaning and servicing stainless steel mixing tanks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 3, 2023
Abate by
Jul 18, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees:  On or about February 3, 2023, employees were not provided training to ensure that was a safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls when performing servicing and cleaning of large stainless steel mixing tanks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Spray-Tek, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346512171.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.