Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SPRAY-TEK, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SPRAY-TEK, LLC in 3355 EAST COLLEY ROAD, BELOIT, WI 53511 (NAICS 325998). OSHA activity number 348107822.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Spray-Tek, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Spray-Tek, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
SPRAY-TEK, LLC
Site address
3355 EAST COLLEY ROAD
City
BELOIT
State
WI
ZIP
53511
Mailing
3355 EAST COLLEY ROAD, BELOIT, WI 53511
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325998
Employees
56
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.28 B02 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 2025
Abate by
Dec 31, 2025
Penalty
Initial $16,550 · Current $10,550 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(2)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee in a hoist area is protected from falling 4 feet (1.2 m) or more to a lower level by one of the systems listed in 29 CFR 1910.28(b)(2)(i)(A)-(C).  On or about February 13, 2025, in phase 2 mixing rooms the employer failed to ensure that when batchers removed guardrail sections to facilitate mixer loading activities were protected from a fall greater than 4ft. Batchers were exposed to a fall onto a hard surface while they facilitated mixer loading activities.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $10550
  • — Z (S) $16550

1910.134 C02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 2025
Abate by
Sep 2, 2025
Penalty
Initial $7,660 · Current $4,883 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible:  On or about and times prior to March 24, 2025, the employer failed to provide voluntary users of KN95 filtering facepiece respirators with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134. Voluntary users of KN95 filtering facepiece respirators were unaware of the respirator's limitations when exposed to nuisance dust in dryer rooms.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4883
  • — Z (S) $7660

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 2025
Abate by
Sep 2, 2025
Penalty
Initial $15,322 · Current $9,768 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:  On or about March 13, 2025, in the mixing rooms, hazardous energy control procedures were not developed when operators or batchers engaged in covered maintenance and servicing activities on the Sani Matic filter(s). Maintenance and servicing performed included but were not limited to setup, cleaning and replacement of filters. Employees were exposed to struck-by hazards from residual energy left inside the filter line.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $9768
  • — Z (S) $15322

1910.147 C04 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 2025
Abate by
Sep 2, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): Procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, and the means to enforce compliance including, but not limited to, 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(A), (c)(4)(ii)(B), (c)(4)(ii)(C) and (c)(4)(ii)(D):  On or about and times prior to March 24, 2025, the employer did not ensure that the energy control procedure addressed all potentially hazardous energy sources for employees who perform servicing operations on equipment such as, but not limited to, the Phase 2 Homogenizer. Servicing operations included, equipment tear down and sanitation. Noted deficiencies included, but may not be limited to, the following:  (1) Specific procedural steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy pursuant to 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(B). The procedure did not specifically address controlling the Homogenizer's pneumatic energy source prior to performing service and maintenance activities on equipment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 2025
Abate by
Sep 2, 2025
Penalty
Initial $7,660 · Current $4,883 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:  On or before March 13, 2025, in Phase 2 Nano room employees who manually handled corrosive materials such as but not limited to Lactic Acid, MPA No. 168, Ultra 1030, and Hydrisoak No. 180 for Clean-In-Place (CIP) operations were not provided with suitable facilities (i.e., eyewash and shower) within the work area for immediate emergency use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4883
  • — Z (S) $7660

1910.147 C07 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 2025
Abate by
Sep 2, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(iv): The employer did not certify that employee training had been accomplished and kept up to date:  On or about March 13, 2025, the employer failed to certify authorized personnel lockout tagout training for employees engaged in covered maintenance and servicing (i.e., teardown, sanitation) activities on the Sani Matic filter(s).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.178 G02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 25, 2025
Abate by
Sep 2, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(g)(2): Battery charging apparatus for industrial trucks located in battery changing and charging installation was not protected from damage by trucks:  On or about March 13, 2025, by the shipping & receiving office located in the warehouse, EnerSys battery charging apparatuses for industrial trucks were not protected from damage.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Spray-Tek, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348107822.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.