Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MACY INDUSTRIES, INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of MACY INDUSTRIES, INC. in 33 FISHERVILLE RD., CONCORD, NH 03303 (NAICS 332322). OSHA activity number 346605108.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Macy Industries, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Macy Industries, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
33 FISHERVILLE RD.
City
CONCORD
State
NH
ZIP
03303
Mailing
33 FISHERVILLE RD., CONCORD, NH 03303
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332322
Employees
12
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.107 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2023
Abate by
Jul 26, 2023
Penalty
Initial $6,250 · Current $3,125 Reduced
29 CFR  1910.107(b)(1): The spray booth�was not�substantially constructed�of steel,�securely and�rigidly supported,�or of�concrete or�masonry.   a. Site - On or about March 9, 2023, Employees were exposed to fire hazards when a portion of the east wall of the spray booth was construction of wood.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3125
  • — Z (S) $6250

1910.107 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2023
Abate by
Jul 26, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.107(f)(3): Sprinklers protecting spraying areas were not kept as free of deposits as practicable:  a. Site - On or about March 9, 2023, Employees were exposed to fire hazards when the sprinklers protecting a spray booth were coated with paint overspray.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.107 G02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2023
Abate by
Jul 26, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.107(g)(2): All spraying areas were not kept as free from the accumulation of deposits of combustible residues as practical, with cleaning conducted daily if necessary:   a. Spray Booth - On or about March 9, 2023,  Employees were exposed to fire hazards when deposits of flammable paints including, but not limited to Sherwin Williams Fast Production Enamel BOSCHO WHITE F75XXW5538-5267, a category 2 flammable liquid, had accumulated on the floor and walls.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2023
Abate by
Jul 26, 2023
Penalty
Initial $7,813 · Current $3,907 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a. Site - On or about March 9, 2023, employees were required to wear respirators while spraying paint, and the employer did not ensure that an effective respiratory protection program was established.  There was no written program covering respirator selection, fit-testing, medical clearance, storage/cleaning, and training requirements.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3906.5
  • — Z (S) $7813

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2023
Abate by
Jul 26, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a. Site - On or about March 9, 2023, employees were required to wear respirators while spraying paint, and the employer did not provide a medical evaluation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2023
Abate by
Jul 26, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):   a. Site - On or about March 9, 2023, employees were required to wear respirators while spraying paint, and the employer did not ensure employees passed an appropriate fit test.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2023
Abate by
Jul 26, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary:  a. Site - On or about March 9, 2023, employees were required to wear respirators while spraying paint, and the employer did not provide respirator training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 H02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2023
Abate by
Jul 26, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or  were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve:   a. Site - On or about March 9, 2023, employees were required to wear respirators while spraying paint, and the employer did not ensure respirators were protected from contamination.  A half-face respirator was stored in the spray booth.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 21, 2023
Abate by
Jul 11, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The employer did not compile a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present using a product identifier that was referenced on the appropriate safety data sheet.   29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which the employees used:  a. Paint Booth - On or about March 9, 2023, a employees  were spray finishing ventilation system components, and the employer did not compile a list of hazardous chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Macy Industries, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346605108.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.