MERIDEN, CT —
OSHA Inspection: TARGET 10 CONSTRUCTION LLC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of TARGET 10 CONSTRUCTION LLC in 33 ROY STREET, MERIDEN, CT 06450 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 346653850.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TARGET 10 CONSTRUCTION LLC
- Site address
- 33 ROY STREET
- City
- MERIDEN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06450
- Mailing
- 5650 MAIN STREET, TRUMBULL, CT 06611
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238990
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Jan 30, 2024
- Abate by
- Feb 12, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $388 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: Location: 33 Roy Street, Meriden, Connecticut Abatement certification and verification for Citation 001, Item 01; Citation 001, Item 02a; Citation 001, Item 02b; Citation 001, Item 02c; Citation 001, Item 02d, Citation 001, Item 02e and Citation 001, Item 02f with a final order date of 9/21/2023 was not received within 10 calendar days (by 10/21/2023) following the abatement due date (10/11/2023).
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $0
- — C (O) $388
- — Z (O) $388
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2023
- Abate by
- Oct 11, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $2,679 · Current $1,340 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. JOBSITE: On or about April 20, 2023, the employer did not ensure the employee exposed to flying particles was wearing eye protection during tasks such as (but not limited to) jackhammering concrete.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1339.5
- — Z (S) $2679
1926.1153 D02 I
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2023
- Abate by
- Oct 11, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $3,349 · Current $1,675 Reduced
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section: JOBSITE: On or about April 20, 2023, the employer did not perform an exposure assessment for the worker exposed to respirable crystalline silica during tasks such as (but not limited to) jackhammering concrete.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1674.5
- — Z (S) $3349
1926.1153 D03 I
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2023
- Abate by
- Oct 11, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(3)(i): The employer did not use engineering and work practice controls to reduce and maintain employee exposure to respirable crystalline silica to or below the PEL, unless the employer can demonstrate that such controls are not feasible: JOBSITE: On or about April 20, 2023, the employer did not ensure engineering controls including concrete dust suppression or removal was used by the worker exposed to respirable crystalline silica during tasks such as (but not limited to) jackhammering concrete.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1153 E01 II
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2023
- Abate by
- Oct 11, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(e)(1)(ii): Respiratory protection was not provided for tasks not listed in Table 1, or where the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection described in Table 1: JOBSITE: On or about April 20, 2023, where engineering controls for Table 1 were not implemented to control exposure to concrete dust, the employer did not ensure respiratory protection was provided for the worker exposed to respirable crystalline silica during tasks such as (but not limited to) jackhammering concrete.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1153 G01
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2023
- Abate by
- Oct 11, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(g)(1): The employer did not establish and implement a written exposure control plan: JOBSITE: On or about April 20, 2023, a written exposure control plan was not established to ensure that workers were protected from exposure to respirable crystalline silica during tasks such as (but not limited to) jackhammering concrete.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1153 I02 I
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2023
- Abate by
- Oct 11, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(i)(2)(i): The employer did not ensure that each covered employee could demonstrate knowledge and understanding of at least the information contained in paragraphs (A) - (F) of this section. JOBSITE: On or about April 20, 2023, the employer did not provide any training on Silica hazards to the employee exposed to respirable crystalline silica during tasks such as (but not limited to) jackhammering concrete.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2023
- Abate by
- Oct 11, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (Construction Reference: 1926.59) JOBSITE: On or about April 20, 2023, the employer did not develop a written hazard communication program for the worker exposed to respirable crystalline silica during tasks such as (but not limited to) jackhammering concrete.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Target 10 Construction LLC
View Target 10 Construction LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238990)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346653850.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.