Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: KINDEN CORPORATION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of KINDEN CORPORATION in LIMA WHARF NAVAL BASE GUAM, SANTA RITA, GU 96915 (NAICS 238210). OSHA activity number 346715196.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Kinden Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Kinden Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
KINDEN CORPORATION
Site address
LIMA WHARF NAVAL BASE GUAM
City
SANTA RITA
State
GU
ZIP
96915
Mailing
P.O. BOX 9609, TAMUNING, GU 96931
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238210
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2023
Abate by
Jul 18, 2023
Penalty
Initial $11,050 · Current $11,050
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  The written respiratory protection program did not include fit testing procedures or training for employees on the hazards they may be exposed to. Employees were exposed to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $11050

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2023
Abate by
Jul 18, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  Employees required to wear N95 respirators while drilling holes into concrete were not medically cleared prior to respirator use. Employees were exposed to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2023
Abate by
Jul 18, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  Employees required to wear N95 respirators while drilling holes into concrete were not fit tested prior to respirator use. Employees were exposed to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2023
Abate by
Jul 3, 2023
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:  At least one employee required to wear a N95 respirator while drilling holes into concrete had facial hair that did not allow the respirator to seal. Employees were exposed to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1153 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2023
Abate by
Jul 3, 2023
Penalty
Initial $11,050 · Current $11,050
29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1): For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.  Within the primary manhole: Employees used a Makita and a Milwaukee rotary hammer drill to drill holes into concrete without any control measures implemented from Table 1-Specified Exposure Control Methods When Working with Materials Containing Crystalline Silica. Employees were exposed to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $11050

View Kinden Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346715196.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.