SANTA RITA, GU —
OSHA Inspection: KINDEN CORPORATION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of KINDEN CORPORATION in LIMA WHARF NAVAL BASE GUAM, SANTA RITA, GU 96915 (NAICS 238210). OSHA activity number 346715196.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KINDEN CORPORATION
- Site address
- LIMA WHARF NAVAL BASE GUAM
- City
- SANTA RITA
- State
- GU
- ZIP
- 96915
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 9609, TAMUNING, GU 96931
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238210
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2023
- Abate by
- Jul 18, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $11,050 · Current $11,050
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: The written respiratory protection program did not include fit testing procedures or training for employees on the hazards they may be exposed to. Employees were exposed to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $11050
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2023
- Abate by
- Jul 18, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: Employees required to wear N95 respirators while drilling holes into concrete were not medically cleared prior to respirator use. Employees were exposed to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2023
- Abate by
- Jul 18, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: Employees required to wear N95 respirators while drilling holes into concrete were not fit tested prior to respirator use. Employees were exposed to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 G01 I A
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2023
- Abate by
- Jul 3, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function: At least one employee required to wear a N95 respirator while drilling holes into concrete had facial hair that did not allow the respirator to seal. Employees were exposed to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1153 C01
- Issued
- Jun 13, 2023
- Abate by
- Jul 3, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $11,050 · Current $11,050
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1): For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section. Within the primary manhole: Employees used a Makita and a Milwaukee rotary hammer drill to drill holes into concrete without any control measures implemented from Table 1-Specified Exposure Control Methods When Working with Materials Containing Crystalline Silica. Employees were exposed to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $11050
More inspections at Kinden Corporation
View Kinden Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238210)
More inspections in GU
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346715196.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.