HOMEWOOD, IL —
OSHA Inspection: VOGT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of VOGT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY in 2033 RIDGE ROAD, HOMEWOOD, IL 60422 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 346869183.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- VOGT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
- Site address
- 2033 RIDGE ROAD
- City
- HOMEWOOD
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 60422
- Mailing
- 402 W. MONDAMIN ST., MINOOKA, IL 60447
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Feb 12, 2024
- Abate by
- Mar 18, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $518 · Current $518
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section. a) On or about July 28, 2023, the employer did not certify to OSHA within 10 days after the abatement date that each of the following cited violations issued had been corrected: Citation Number Item Number Abatement Date 01001a12/05/2023 01001b12/05/2023 01001c12/05/2023 01001d12/05/2023 0100412/05/2023
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $518
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Oct 17, 2023
- Abate by
- Dec 5, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $5,358 · Current $2,679 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a) On or about July 28, 2023, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were required to wear Milwaukee N95 48-73-4014 respiratory protection when conducting masonry operations. The employer failed to develop and implement a written respiratory protection program, which included worksite specific procedures, thereby exposing employees to hazards including, but not limited to, respirable silica dusts. The respiratory protection program shall include, at a minimum, procedures for selecting respirators; medical evaluations; fit testing; procedures for proper use in routine and reasonably foreseeable emergency situations; procedures for cleaning, string, inspecting, repairing and discarding respirators; employee training regarding respiratory hazards they are exposed to, proper uses and limitations of respirators; and procedures for regularly evaluating the effectiveness of the respirator program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2679
- — Z (S) $5358
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Oct 17, 2023
- Abate by
- Dec 5, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) On or about July 28, 2023, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer had not ensured that each employee required to wear Milwaukee N95 48-73-4014 respirators had been provided with a medical evaluation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Oct 17, 2023
- Abate by
- Dec 5, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: a) On or about July 28, 2023, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were required to wear tight-fitting facepiece respirators. The employer did not ensure employees were provided with a fit test prior to the initial use of the respirator(s), thereby exposing employees to the hazards including, but not limited to, respirable silica dust.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K01
- Issued
- Oct 17, 2023
- Abate by
- Dec 5, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide effective training to ensure that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of 1910.134(k)(1)(i) - (vii): a) On or about, July 28, 2023, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were provided with and required to wear Milwaukee N95 48-73-4014 respirators for exposure to materials including respirable silica dust. The employer did not ensure that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of the required training elements of the standard including, but not limited to, why respiratory protection is necessary, factors that compromise protection, proper fit, proper use, limitations and capabilities, change schedules, emergency use, inspection, maintenance and/or storage, general requirements of 29 CFR 1910.134, and how to recognize medical signs and symptoms.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.303 B01
- Issued
- Oct 17, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,465 · Current $2,233 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.303(b)(1): Grinding machines were not equipped with safety guards in conformance with the requirements of American National Standards Institute, B7.1-1970, Safety Code for the Use, Care and Protection of Abrasive Wheels, and paragraph (d) of this section. (a) On or about July 28, 2023, at the above addressed jobsite, grinding machines were not equipped with safety guards in conformance with the requirements of American National Standards Institute and/or paragraph (d) of 29 CFR 1926.303 as required.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2232.5
- — Z (S) $4465
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Oct 17, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $6,250 · Current $3,856 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt with lanyard attached to the boom or basket was not worn by employee(s) working from an aerial lift: a) On or about July 28, 2023, at the above addressed jobsite, an employee was exposed to the hazard of falling, from a height of eleven (11) feet, while working from a JLG 660SJ aerial lift platform without wearing fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3856
- — Z (S) $6250
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Oct 17, 2023
- Abate by
- Dec 5, 2023
- Penalty
- Initial $4,465 · Current $2,233 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a) On or about July 28, 2023, at the above addressed jobsite, the employee conducting masonry operations was not provided training on how to minimize fall hazards, thereby exposing the employee to the hazards associated with falls.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2232.5
- — Z (S) $4465
More inspections at Vogt Construction Company
View Vogt Construction Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 346869183.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.