HOUSTON, TX —
OSHA Inspection: JZNEE RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGY INC.
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of JZNEE RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGY INC. in 12001 NORTH HOUSTON ROSSLYN RD., HOUSTON, TX 77086 (NAICS 221114). OSHA activity number 347100158.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JZNEE RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGY INC.
- Site address
- 12001 NORTH HOUSTON ROSSLYN RD.
- City
- HOUSTON
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77086
- Mailing
- 12001 NORTH HOUSTON ROSSLYN RD., HOUSTON, TX 77086
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 221114
- Employees
- 59
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- Jan 18, 2024
- Abate by
- Feb 13, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $11,292 · Current $6,775 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1):The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent: In the following instances, employees were exposed to noise levels exceeding an 8-hour time weighted average of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent, and the employer did not have a hearing conservation program: a. A line operator was exposed to continuous noise at 904.7% of the daily noise exposure (8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 105.9 dBA during the 410-minute sampling period on November 13, 2023; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 70 minutes not sampled. b. A line operator was exposed to continuous noise at 1366.7% of the daily noise exposure (8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 108.9 dBA during the 422-minute sampling period on November 13, 2023; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 58 minutes not sampled. c. A tube inspector was exposed to continuous noise at 285.9% of the daily noise exposure (8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 97.6 dBA during the 183-minute sampling period on November 13, 2023; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 297 minutes not sampled. d. A crew lead was exposed to continuous noise at 418.2% of the daily noise exposure (8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 100.3 dBA during the 423-minute sampling period on November 13, 2023; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 57 minutes not sampled. e. An operator was exposed to continuous noise at 111.5% of the daily noise exposure (8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 dBA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 90.8 dBA during the 412-minute sampling period on November 13, 2023; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 68 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $6775.2
- — Z (S) $11292
1910.134 C02 II
- Issued
- Jan 18, 2024
- Abate by
- Feb 13, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $7,813 · Current $4,688 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user: On or about November 13, 2023, employees were exposed to respiratory hazards while voluntarily wearing elastomeric half mask respirators when observing a welding process and the employer did not ensure the employee was medically evaluated.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4687.8
- — Z (S) $7813
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Jan 18, 2024
- Abate by
- Feb 13, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: On or about November 13, 2023, employees were exposed to respiratory hazards while wearing elastomeric half mask respirators when observing a welding process without the employer determining the employee's ability to use a respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1000 A02
- Issued
- Jan 18, 2024
- Abate by
- Feb 13, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $6,453 · Current $3,872 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1000(a)(2):Employee(s) were exposed to an airborne concentration of zinc oxide fume listed in Table Z-1 in excess of the 8 hour Time Weighted Average concentration of 5mg/m3: In the�following instance,�an employee was exposed�to zinc oxide fume in excess�of the�permissible exposure�level (PEL)�for the�8-hour time�weighted average�concentration: A line operator, who was observing a welding process, was exposed to zinc oxide fume at a time weighted average of 5.79 mg/m3. This level exceeds the permissible exposure level for zinc oxide fume of 5 mg/m3 by 1.15 times. This exposure was derived from a sample collected over a 405-minute sampling period on November 13, 2023.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3871.8
- — Z (S) $6453
1910.1000 E
- Issued
- Jan 18, 2024
- Abate by
- Feb 13, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1000(e): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d): On November 13, 2023, an employee was exposed to zinc oxide fume in excess of the permissible exposure�level (PEL)�for the�8-hour time�weighted average�concentration and feasible engineering controls were not implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Jznee Renewable Energy Technology INC.
View Jznee Renewable Energy Technology INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 221114)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347100158.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.