OSHA Inspection: LUIS PEREZ

Issued

Dec 22, 2023

Penalty

Initial $2,679 · Current $2,679

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.102(a)(1):The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles:  a)  At 4367 Winged Elm Court, Lot 86K Woodlands, Milton, Florida:  On December 13, 2023; the employer allowed his employees to operate pneumatic nail guns without eye protection while performing framing activities exposing his employees to struck-by hazards.

Issued

Dec 22, 2023

Penalty

Initial $4,018 · Current $4,018

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   a)  At 4367 Winged Elm Court, Lot 86K Woodlands, Milton, Florida:  On December 13, 2023; the employer allowed his employees to perform framing activities without fall protection exposing his employees to a fall hazard of 9 feet 6 inches to the ground below.

Issued

Dec 22, 2023

Abate by

Jan 9, 2024

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards:  a)  At 4367 Winged Elm Court, Lot 86K Woodlands, Milton, Florida:  On December 13, 2023; the employer allowed his employees to perform framing activities without first ensuring his employees were trained on the hazards associated with falls to include but not limited to setting up and inspecting fall protection exposing his employees to a fall hazard of 9 feet 6 inches to the ground below.

Issued

Dec 22, 2023

Penalty

Initial $2,679 · Current $2,679

General-duty citation text

29 CFR  1926.1053(b)(1): The ladder extension was positioned such that deflection under a load, by itself, would cause the ladder to slip off its support:  a)  At 4367 Winged Elm Court, Lot 86K Woodlands, Milton, Florida:  On December 13, 2023; the employer allowed his employees to use an extension ladder to gain access to the roof and the rails of the ladder did not exceed three feet above the roof landing to provide safe access exposing his employees to a fall hazard of 9 feet 6 inches to the ground below.