Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LAZCO CONTRACTING INC.

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of LAZCO CONTRACTING INC. in 222 WEST STREET, KEENE, NH 03431 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 347203036.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Lazco Contracting INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Lazco Contracting INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
222 WEST STREET
City
KEENE
State
NH
ZIP
03431
Mailing
720 E. INDUSTRIAL PARK DR., MANCHESTER, NH 03109
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238990
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2024
Abate by
Jun 12, 2024
Penalty
Initial $518 · Current $518
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): Within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, the employer must certify to OSHA (the Agency) that each cited violation has been abated, except as provided in paragraph (c)(2) of this section:  The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation No.1 Item No(s). 1b and 2 nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent April 18, 2024.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $518

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2024
Abate by
Jun 26, 2024
Penalty
Initial $518 · Current $518
29 CFR  1903.19(d)(1): The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.   The employer did not furnish the abatement required for citations issued within 10 calendar days for Citation No. 1 Item No(s). 1a nor did they respond to the progress report letter sent November 21, 2022.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $518

1926.451 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 12 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2024
Abate by
Mar 21, 2024
Penalty
Initial $6,452 · Current $6,452
29 CFR  1926.451(c)(1):Supported scaffolds with a height to base width (including outrigger supports, if used) ratio of more than four to one (4:1) were not restrained from tipping by guying, tying, bracing, or equivalent means.  Site- Employees erecting a mobile baker scaffold 2 feet 5 inches in width was not restrained from tipping when the working platform height exceed 9 feet 8 inches in height. An employee working from the top of a double stacked baker scaffold, with a working height of 11 feet 6 inches, was not restrained from tipping while the third baker scaffold was added to the top of the mobile scaffold.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $6452

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2024
Abate by
Mar 21, 2024
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person.  Site- An employee working from the top of a double stacked baker scaffold, with a working height of 11 feet 6 inches and a width of 2 feet 5 inches, was not restrained from tipping while the third baker scaffold was added to the top of the mobile scaffold. The employer did not provide a competent person to erect a triple stacked baker scaffold where the scaffold was not secured from tipping and adequate fall protection was not provided.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2024
Abate by
May 1, 2024
Penalty
Initial $4,610 · Current $4,610
29 CFR  1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.   Site- Employees exposed to a fall and scaffold tipping hazard while erecting and working from the top of a double stacked baker scaffold were not provided with scaffold training from the employer.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4610

View Lazco Contracting INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347203036.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.