MILES CITY, MT —
OSHA Inspection: FRANK'S BODY SHOP
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FRANK'S BODY SHOP in 405 S HAYNES AVE., MILES CITY, MT 59301 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 347264632.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FRANK'S BODY SHOP
- Site address
- 405 S HAYNES AVE.
- City
- MILES CITY
- State
- MT
- ZIP
- 59301
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 1105, MILES CITY, MT 59301
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811121
- Employees
- 13
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- May 8, 2024
- Abate by
- Jun 4, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $2,350 · Current $1,410 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1):A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: a. Paint Booth: On or about February 5th, 2024, and at times prior, employees were exposed to chemical hazards while performing spray operations on vehicles. The employer failed to ensure that employees required to use respirators were covered under a respiratory protection program.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1410
- — Z (S) $2350
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- May 8, 2024
- Abate by
- Jun 4, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1):The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a. Paint Booth: On or about February 5th, 2024, and at times prior, employees were exposed to chemical hazards while performing spray operations on vehicles. The employer failed to ensure that employees required to use respirators were medically evaluated prior to wearing the respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- May 8, 2024
- Abate by
- Jun 4, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1):The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): a. Paint Booth: On or about February 5th, 2024, and at times prior, employees were exposed to chemical hazards while performing spray operations on vehicles. The employer failed to ensure that employees wearing respirators were fit tested prior to their use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 H02 I
- Issued
- May 8, 2024
- Abate by
- Jun 4, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i):Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve: a. Paint Booth: On or about February 5th, 2024, and at times prior, employees were exposed to chemical hazards while performing spray operations on vehicles. The employer failed to ensure that procedures were implemented for storing respirators to prevent damage.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K
- Issued
- May 8, 2024
- Abate by
- Jun 4, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k):The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary: a. Paint Booth: On or about February 5th, 2024, and at times prior, employees were exposed to chemical hazards while performing spray operations on vehicles. The employer failed to ensure that employees were trained on usage, maintenance and limitations of respirators they were using.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Frank'S Body Shop
View Frank'S Body Shop's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811121)
More inspections in MT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347264632.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.