WORCESTER, MA —
OSHA Inspection: ANGEL ORTIZ
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ANGEL ORTIZ in 360 SALISBURY STREET, WORCESTER, MA 01601 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 347267239.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ANGEL ORTIZ
- Site address
- 360 SALISBURY STREET
- City
- WORCESTER
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 01601
- Mailing
- 20 ELEVENTH AVENUE, WOONSOCKET, RI 02895
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Oct 25, 2024
- Abate by
- Nov 21, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $388 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: 360 Salisbury St, Worcester, MA: As of October 22, 2024, the employer had not submitted certification that the abatement was completed for citation 1, item 1, item 2a, item 2b, item 2c, item 2d, and item 3, from inspection 1726723, issued on May 17, 2024, with final order date of June 18, 2024, and with an abatement due date of July 8, 2024.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $388
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Oct 25, 2024
- Abate by
- Nov 21, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $388 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. 360 Salisbury St, Worcester, MA: As of October 22, 2024, the employer had not submitted documentation demonstrating that the abatement was completed for citation 1, items 2a, 2b, and 2c from inspection 1726723, issued on May 17, 2024, with final order date of June 18, 2024, and with an abatement due date of July 8, 2024.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $388
1926.100 A
- Issued
- May 17, 2024
- Abate by
- Jul 8, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $2,765 · Current $2,765
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: 360 Salisbury St., Worcester, MA: On or about February 8, 2024, an employee on the ground-level of a residential construction site was not wearing a protective helmet while materials were being dropped and bundles of shingles raised to the roof, from a height greater than 24 feet, exposing the employee to head injuries.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2765
- — Z (S) $2765
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- May 17, 2024
- Abate by
- Jul 8, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system: 360 Salisbury St., Worcester, MA: On or about February 8, 2024, an employee was observed working on a residential structure engaged in roofing activities with unprotected sides and edges greater than 24 feet above the ground below and was not protected by either guard rails, safety net systems or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.502 D15
- Issued
- May 17, 2024
- Abate by
- Jul 8, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $4,839
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorages used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment were not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds per employee attached: 360 Salisbury St., Worcester, MA: On or about February 8, 2024, an employee performing roofing work was using an anchor point that was installed incorrectly without the required number and specific type of attachment fasteners required for proper installation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4839
- — Z (S) $4839
1926.502 D17
- Issued
- May 17, 2024
- Abate by
- Jul 8, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17): The attachment point of the body harness was not located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head: 360 Salisbury St., Worcester, MA: On or about February 8, 2024, an employee's fall protection lifeline/lanyard attachment points were located on the front of the harness and not located in the center of the employee's back near shoulder level, as required.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.503 A02
- Issued
- May 17, 2024
- Abate by
- Jul 8, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $3,457 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2): The employer did not assure that each employee exposed to fall hazards was trained by a competent person qualified in the areas specified in 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(2)(i) through (viii): 360 Salisbury St, Worcester, MA: On or about February 8, 2024, the employer did not assure that employees, while working at a fall height of 24 feet, were trained in both the nature of fall hazards in the work area and the correct procedures for erecting, maintaining, disassembling, and inspecting the fall protection systems that were used.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3457
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- May 17, 2024
- Abate by
- Jul 8, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $3,457 · Current $2,396 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: 360 Salisbury St., Worcester, MA: On or about February 8, 2024, an employee was observed using a ladder that did not extend 3 feet past the upper landing surface of the roof they were accessing.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2396
- — Z (S) $3457
More inspections at Angel Ortiz
View Angel Ortiz's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347267239.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.