APOPKA, FL —
OSHA Inspection: PFG CONSTRUCTION, INC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PFG CONSTRUCTION, INC in 891 POINT EMERSON BLVD, LOT 18, 85, 86., APOPKA, FL 32703 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 347298788.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PFG CONSTRUCTION, INC
- Site address
- 891 POINT EMERSON BLVD, LOT 18, 85, 86.
- City
- APOPKA
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32703
- Mailing
- 6648 MISSION CLUB BLVD APT 201, ORLANDO, FL 32831
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 16
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $6,452 · Current $3,871 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b). a. On or about February 22, 2024, on Lot 18, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximate 10-feet, in that the use of a guardrail system was not provided on the residential staircase while the employees conducted framing work activities on the second floor. b. On or about February 22, 2024, on Lot 18, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximate 10-feet 9-iches, in that the use of a guardrail system was not provided on the residential foyer while the employees conducted framing work activities on the second floor. c. On or about February 22, 2024, on Lot 85, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximate 10-feet, in that the use of a guardrail system was not provided on the residential staircase while the employees conducted framing work activities on the second floor. d. On or about February 22, 2024, on Lot 85, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximate 10-feet 9-inches, in that the use of a guardrail system was not provided on the residential foyer while the employees conducted framing work activities on the second floor. e. On or about February 22, 2024, on Lot 85, employees conducted framing work activities on the front of the house were exposed to fall hazards of 20-feet 7-inches, in that the use of fall protection was not enforced. f. On or about February 12, 2024, on Lot 85, employees conducting framing work activities on the front entrance of the house were exposed to fall hazards of 9-feet 10-inches, in that the use of fall protection was not enforced. g. On or about February 22, 2024, on Lot 86, employees conducting framing work activities on top of a roof truss at the center of the house were exposed to fall hazards of 16-feet 10-inches, in that the use of fall protection was not enforced. h. On or about February 22, 2024, on Lot 86, employees conducted framing work activities while standing on the concrete walls of the house were exposed to fall hazards of 9-feet 4-inches, in that the use of fall protection was not enforced.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3871.2
- — Z (S) $6452
1926.503 B01
- Issued
- Mar 25, 2024
- Abate by
- Apr 18, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $518 · Current $311 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1):The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer. a. On or about February 22, 2024, the employer did not have fall protection training certificates for employees conducting framing activities.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $310.8
- — Z (O) $518
More inspections at PFG Construction, INC
View PFG Construction, INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347298788.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.