Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: PFG CONSTRUCTION, INC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PFG CONSTRUCTION, INC in 891 POINT EMERSON BLVD, LOT 18, 85, 86., APOPKA, FL 32703 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 347298788.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch PFG Construction, INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for PFG Construction, INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
891 POINT EMERSON BLVD, LOT 18, 85, 86.
City
APOPKA
State
FL
ZIP
32703
Mailing
6648 MISSION CLUB BLVD APT 201, ORLANDO, FL 32831
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
16
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 8 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2024
Penalty
Initial $6,452 · Current $3,871 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.501(b)(13):Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b).  a. On or about February 22, 2024, on Lot 18, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximate 10-feet, in that the use of a guardrail system was not provided on the residential staircase while the employees conducted framing work activities on the second floor.  b. On or about February 22, 2024, on Lot 18, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximate 10-feet 9-iches, in that the use of a guardrail system was not provided on the residential foyer while the employees conducted framing work activities on the second floor.  c. On or about February 22, 2024, on Lot 85, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximate 10-feet, in that the use of a guardrail system was not provided on the residential staircase while the employees conducted framing work activities on the second floor.  d. On or about February 22, 2024, on Lot 85, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximate 10-feet 9-inches, in that the use of a guardrail system was not provided on the residential foyer while the employees conducted framing work activities on the second floor.   e. On or about February 22, 2024,  on Lot 85, employees conducted framing work activities on the front of the house were exposed to fall hazards of 20-feet 7-inches, in that the use of fall protection was not enforced.    f.  On or about February 12, 2024,  on Lot 85, employees conducting framing work activities on the front entrance of the house were exposed to fall hazards of 9-feet 10-inches, in that the use of fall protection was not enforced.   g. On or about February 22, 2024,  on Lot 86, employees conducting framing work activities  on top of a roof truss at the center of the house were exposed to fall hazards of 16-feet 10-inches, in that the use of fall protection was not enforced.   h. On or about February 22, 2024,  on Lot 86, employees conducted framing work activities while standing on the concrete walls of the house were exposed to fall hazards of  9-feet 4-inches, in that the use of fall protection was not enforced.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3871.2
  • — Z (S) $6452

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious 3 instances 16 exposed
Issued
Mar 25, 2024
Abate by
Apr 18, 2024
Penalty
Initial $518 · Current $311 Reduced
29 CFR  1926.503(b)(1):The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written (training) certification record including the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer.  a.  On or about February 22, 2024, the employer did not have fall protection training certificates for employees conducting framing activities.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $310.8
  • — Z (O) $518

View PFG Construction, INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347298788.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.