BUXTON, ME —
OSHA Inspection: TEM, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of TEM, INC. in 8 PIERCE DRIVE, BUXTON, ME 04093 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 347304826.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TEM, INC.
- Site address
- 8 PIERCE DRIVE
- City
- BUXTON
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04093
- Mailing
- 8 PIERCE DRIVE, BUXTON, ME 04093
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332999
- Employees
- 29
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 A04
- Issued
- Apr 29, 2024
- Abate by
- Jul 30, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $11,292 · Current $3,539 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4): Modifications or additions that affect the capacity and safe operation of powered industrial trucks were performed by the employer without the manufacturer's prior written approval: Establishment The employer did not obtain the manufacturer's written approval before using a front-end addition.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3538.87
- — Z (S) $11292
1910.178 A05
- Issued
- Apr 29, 2024
- Abate by
- Jul 30, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(5): The powered industrial truck was equipped with front-end attachments other than factory-installed attachments; however, the employer did not request that the truck be marked to identify the attachments and show the approximate weight of the truck and attachment combination at maximum elevation with the load laterally centered: � Establishment - The powered industrial trucks used with in-house-constructed man baskets were not marked to identify the attachment, the approximate weight of the truck, or the attachment combination at maximum elevation with the load laterally centered.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- Apr 29, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $8,067 · Current $3,539 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not being conducted at least once every three years: Establishment -�The employer did not ensure that employees operating powered industrial trucks were evaluated at least once every three years.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3538.87
- — Z (S) $8067
1910.303 G01
- Issued
- Apr 29, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,113 · Current $3,539 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1):Sufficient access and working space was not provided and maintained about all electric equipment (operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground) to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of such equipment: Back Workshop - Electrical Panels SP2 and SP2A were obstructed by two full 55-gallon drums of coolant.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3538.87
- — Z (S) $4113
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Apr 29, 2024
- Abate by
- Jul 30, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $4,839 · Current $3,539 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR �1910.1200(e)(1):Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program which at included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): Establishment - The written hazard communication program was insufficient in that it did not include the 16 sections of Safety Data Sheets (SDS) as well as the nine Globally Harmonized System (GHS) pictograms.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3538.89
- — Z (S) $4839
1910.178 L06
- Issued
- Apr 29, 2024
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l): Establishment - The employer did not ensure there were written certifications for all employees that had received powered industrial truck training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at TEM, INC.
View TEM, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332999)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 347304826.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.