Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: TEM, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of TEM, INC. in 8 PIERCE DRIVE, BUXTON, ME 04093 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 348433970.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch TEM, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for TEM, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
TEM, INC.
Site address
8 PIERCE DRIVE
City
BUXTON
State
ME
ZIP
04093
Mailing
8 PIERCE DRIVE, BUXTON, ME 04093
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332999
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Sep 17, 2025
Penalty
Initial $3,405 · Current $2,384 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):  Establishment - The employer failed to assess the hazards associated with specific chemicals that necessitate the use of personal protective equipment and did not incorporate this information into the Job Hazard Analysis Certifications/PPE Hazard Assessment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2383.5
  • — Z (S) $3405

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 17, 2025
Penalty
Initial $5,958 · Current $4,171 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Points of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employees from having any part of their body in the danger zones during operating cycles:  Production floor - A point of operation guard was not installed on the BLISS 200-ton hydraulic press.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4170.6
  • — Z (S) $5958

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Sep 17, 2025
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, the identity of the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed, and the date the hazard assessment was done:  Establishment - The written certification provided by the employer does not include the name of the individual who certified that the evaluation was conducted.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View TEM, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 348433970.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.